Results 1 to 10 of 55

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player JayCommon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    963
    Character
    Indaki Sativa
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Kosmos992k View Post
    A temporary ban is a very limited punishment since once the ban is lifted they get back in with everything..

    I highly doubt this, do you know someone firsthand that had this experience? It would make no sense at all to ban someone (albeit temporarily) to allow them to come back and prosper with the very thing they were banned for doing.

    In 2.0 some people (some wrongly, some rightly) were accused of buying RMT and had Gil directly removed from their accounts. I'm sure all of the people who got the temporary ban will have most, if not all, of their gil removed from their account when they are able to return.


    Quote Originally Posted by Stupiduglytaru View Post
    all im going to say is i have received an rmt advertising tell in weeks here on phoenix so gj se
    Must be nice... I can play for about 4hrs a day and 3hrs of that is normally spent in coil. I get about 40-50 tells on Goblin for the last week. ;-;
    (1)

  2. #2
    Player Kosmos992k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    4,349
    Character
    Kosmos Meishou
    World
    Behemoth
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by JayCommon View Post
    I highly doubt this, do you know someone firsthand that had this experience? It would make no sense at all to ban someone (albeit temporarily) to allow them to come back and prosper with the very thing they were banned for doing.

    In 2.0 some people (some wrongly, some rightly) were accused of buying RMT and had Gil directly removed from their accounts. I'm sure all of the people who got the temporary ban will have most, if not all, of their gil removed from their account when they are able to return.
    I can't say either way, all I can do is go by the wording of the notice that indicates the action taken was a temp ban. I remember players having gil confiscated, right or wrong, but I don't remember seeing a complaint about that recently, so I presumed that the number of false positives convinced SE that it was not a viable tactic.
    (0)