How at all did my post elude to people being locked from an achievement? I clearly stated that people play the game for that content, only saying that there are gearsets that exist for achievements. That was merely to validate a point that it is content for players.
to simplify, People like collecting full sets of gear for the look. They want to take advantage of the glamour system. Now to take full advantage of that system, I need to pay extra. That could be someones sole reason for playing this game and now they are forced to pay for the full experience.
Make sense?
I would like to collect the whole collection of winter clothing from Zara, but damn I have to pay for it? What sorcery is this?? Better round up some people and start a protest cause I paid like tons of taxes to this country man.How at all did my post elude to people being locked from an achievement? I clearly stated that people play the game for that content, only saying that there are gearsets that exist for achievements. That was merely to validate a point that it is content for players.
to simplify, People like collecting full sets of gear for the look. They want to take advantage of the glamour system. Now to take full advantage of that system, I need to pay extra. That could be someones sole reason for playing this game and now they are forced to pay for the full experience.
Make sense?
This response means what? How is this contributing to the point I stated?
So I'm only allowed to give positive feedback otherwise I get responded to with whatever the above is?
Constructive response plz
Okay, let me break things down for you.
- SE placed optional vanity items behind cash shop.
- Players unhappy because they deem those items as personal achievement ("omg, I must have that but I am unwilling to pay more").
- Proceed to flood General Discussion forum with many QQ threads.
- General Discussion reduced to a complain/protest subforum rather than a discussion forum (people demanding answers from Devs).
Clear enough?
Thats much clearer than whatever that last post was, But again they are deemed as content because they are content that is important to people playing this game (thats what they play with when they log in). People are going to keep making these threads because they want their opinion to be heard. The biggest arguement at the moment is that of vanity not being content, and this wedding content being behind the paywall. Just because feedback isn't positive doesn't mean it should be instantly shot down.Okay, let me break things down for you.
- SE placed optional vanity items behind cash shop.
- Players unhappy because they deem those items as personal achievement ("omg, I must have that but I am unwilling to pay more").
- Proceed to flood General Discussion forum with many QQ threads.
- General Discussion reduced to a complain/protest subforum rather than a discussion forum (people demanding answers from Devs).
Clear enough?
Customers make complaints, that's what the forums are for... Trolling them doesn't help, what he quoted was nothing but ad homim trolling.Okay, let me break things down for you.
- SE placed optional vanity items behind cash shop.
- Players unhappy because they deem those items as personal achievement ("omg, I must have that but I am unwilling to pay more").
- Proceed to flood General Discussion forum with many QQ threads.
- General Discussion reduced to a complain/protest subforum rather than a discussion forum (people demanding answers from Devs).
Clear enough?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.