Results 1 to 10 of 381

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Magis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    1,253
    Character
    Magis Luagis
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Fyrebrand View Post
    snip
    Who's forcing you (Han/Jabba in your strange analogy) to wear certain armour in the game? If you don't like how something looks, you can glamour it, that's why it exists. I'd agree with you if the game had no option outside those clothes and you didn't like it, but the game literally allows you to replace your armour with anything else and keep the stats. Leila in your example didn't want to wear that uniform but didn't have a choice, however you do. At the same time you want to remove the ability for other women and men to dress up their characters how they see fit cause reasons?

    Also dat raging. I think you setup some strange strawman to burn down right there.
    (3)
    Last edited by Magis; 12-03-2014 at 06:54 AM.

  2. #2
    Player
    Fyrebrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    1,188
    Character
    Friel Wyndor
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Magis View Post
    you want to remove the ability for other women and men to dress up their characters how they see fit


    No. That is not what I want. That is not what anyone wants, and it's getting really ridiculous how often some of you keep accusing people of this.

    The Star Wars anecdote was a bit exaggerated, but the point was that Leia's decision to stop trotting around in underwear when given the chance has no impact whatsoever on your own freedoms or outfit selection. When, in that story, did Leia track down all bikinis in the galaxy and have them destroyed? When did she pass a law, banning women from showing their skin? She was just making a choice for herself. It should not have to be a debate. But because she didn't want to parade around in revealing, sexy outfits all the time, Han Solo threw a totally inappropriate conniption fit. Which is basically what half of you are doing in this thread, in response to someone simply asking for female characters to not be treated by default as models for swimsuits and dominatrix gear.

    FFXIV is not nearly as bad as most other games, of course. Here is what typically passes for female "armor" in Tera, for example. But the point still holds, that there is a disparity between how male and female armor is designed, and how much skin either of those show off. Should a female dragoon be able to show their midriff and look sexy? Sure, why not, this is a fantasy game, let people dress their characters as they please. But why can't we get the fully-covered version, as well? And why can't we simply ask for it, without it being a freaking controversy?

    Quote Originally Posted by NozomiKei View Post
    Sorry to inform you but I'm not the one who came up with the term. I also think calling it something else would be good for the movement because of the negative associations misandrists have gotten attached to it and because uninformed people tend to make the assumption that it only affects females when that isn't true.
    Sometimes people just refer to it as "gender equality," which I suppose is probably a better term and captures the spirit of it better. But on the other hand, people are going to misrepresent your position no matter what you call it.
    (4)
    Last edited by Fyrebrand; 12-03-2014 at 09:56 AM.

  3. #3
    Player
    Magis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    1,253
    Character
    Magis Luagis
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Fyrebrand View Post
    No. That is not what I want. That is not what anyone wants, and it's getting really ridiculous how often some of you keep accusing people of this.

    The Star Wars anecdote was a bit exaggerated, but the point was that Leia's decision to stop trotting around in underwear when given the chance has no impact whatsoever on your own freedoms or outfit selection. When, in that story, did Leia track down all bikinis in the galaxy and have them destroyed? When did she pass a law, banning women from showing their skin? She was just making a choice for herself. It should not have to be a debate. But because she didn't want to parade around in revealing, sexy outfits all the time, Han Solo threw a totally inappropriate conniption fit. Which is basically what half of you are doing in this thread, in response to someone simply asking for female characters to not be treated by default as models for swimsuits and dominatrix gear.
    So then what is your complaint here? You are given the choice if you want to wear said armour or not thanks to the glamor system. You aren't forced to wear something because of it's stats, you can change it to w.e you want.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fyrebrand View Post

    FFXIV is not nearly as bad as most other games, of course. Here is what typically passes for female "armor" in Tera, for example. But the point still holds, that there is a disparity between how male and female armor is designed, and how much skin either of those show off. Should a female dragoon be able to show their midriff and look sexy? Sure, why not, this is a fantasy game, let people dress their characters as they please. But why can't we get the fully-covered version, as well? And why can't we simply ask for it, without it being a freaking controversy?
    Tera is laughed at by most people for it's art direction, especially concerning their skimpy demon race. You might as well have said Scarlet Blade. Anyway, this is a FFXIV board, and people here are primarily talking about FFXIV. So you have a problem with one or two pieces of armour when you can replace it with countless other sets. I too have a problem with some armour, and decided to glamor it over. This sounds more like making the issue a mountain out of a molehill.

    Quote Originally Posted by NozomiKei View Post
    Your character looks quite a bit like Tupsi's.

    Sorry to inform you but I'm not the one who came up with the term. I also think calling it something else would be good for the movement because of the negative associations misandrists have gotten attached to it and because uninformed people tend to make the assumption that it only affects females when that isn't true.
    I heard the term "egalitarian" used.
    (1)
    Last edited by Magis; 12-03-2014 at 11:33 AM.

  4. #4
    Player
    Cyrus-Wallace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    The Mists
    Posts
    1,357
    Character
    Lucille Wallace
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Fyrebrand View Post

    FFXIV is not nearly as bad as most other games, of course. Here is what typically passes for female "armor" in Tera, for example. But the point still holds, that there is a disparity between how male and female armor is designed, and how much skin either of those show off. Should a female dragoon be able to show their midriff and look sexy? Sure, why not, this is a fantasy game, let people dress their characters as they please. But why can't we get the fully-covered version, as well? And why can't we simply ask for it, without it being a freaking controversy?
    .
    This comment is kinda unrelated to your point: That hole on the tummy looks ridic IN MY OPINION.

    I'll kill someone if they mess with my DRK armor when released.
    (0)

  5. #5
    Player
    Canadane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    7,508
    Character
    King Canadane
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Sage Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyrus-Wallace View Post
    This comment is kinda unrelated to your point: That hole on the tummy looks ridic IN MY OPINION.

    I'll kill someone if they mess with my DRK armor when released.
    The hole makes sense due to the physical actions a dragoon partakes in. Jumping and poledancing like they do requires a great deal of core stomach movement. If you were in plate or hard scale armour, this would be much harder to do. So while it looks ridiculous, it has it's needs.
    Though the chainmail cover would be nice to be able to turn on.
    (1)

    http://king.canadane.com