Results -9 to 0 of 112

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    TheRogueX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Ul'Dah - Thanalan
    Posts
    877
    Character
    Arias Lightbearer
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Felis View Post
    Do you really think the new zones would be for low lvl while they increase the level cap? The new zones would be lv 50-60
    Not all of the new zones will be for 50-60 content. See below.

    Quote Originally Posted by MilesSaintboroguh View Post
    You would not have a new character start in Ishgard and then be told they aren't allowed to come back until they reach the 3.0 story.
    Why not have a new character start in Ishgard during its lockdown, and play out story up until it meets with 3.0? There's nothing that says that a new character starting in Ishgard has to be chronologically linked to 3.0 immediately upon character creation.

    Quote Originally Posted by silentwindfr View Post
    it will be stupid of them part to add low level area for an expansion, a good example for people that seems to miss the point are wow (the one they take inspiration) exept pandarie that was a special case... wrath of the lich king: new continent, new city all high level. Burning crusade: new continent, new city, all was high level area..
    Burning Crusade: New races, new cities, NEW LEVELING ZONES... oh, did you forget about that?
    Cataclysm: Well, they changed EVERYTHING, but guess what else they added? New races, new cities, NEW LEVELING ZONES. Apparently you forgot about that too.
    Mists of Panderia: New race, new city, new leveling zones.

    So basically, you're absolutely wrong. 3 of their 5 expansions had new LOW LEVEL zones in which their new races could level up.
    (0)
    Last edited by TheRogueX; 11-07-2014 at 03:20 AM.