Lost 1 day of play.

[LilithMakyomo]

If you read what I typed I am clearly referencing ToS and license agreements as a whole. He was arguing that everyone should always read them which is absurd. Of course you could read this one in a shorter amount of time, but that doesn't defeat the fact that one does not simply just read a license agreement. You all want to acknowledge the rules but you don't want to acknowledge reality and human behavior. Get over yourselves and your thinking you're right because you can reference a rule someone else came up with. The fact is that nobody in here can give a good reason why we shouldn't be compensated. And what's even more pathetic is all your guys' inability to understand that nobody is actually worried about the half dollar being lost, that it is merely a matter of principle. Get it? A matter of principle. Sometimes I wonder if I'm being trolled, but so many people say the same idiotic things. This is what we call "mass delusion".

Common sense dictates if you are paying for something repeatedly, you should read the ToS. And you shouldn't reference something you have not read, that just shows lack of understanding.

Oh, and "reference a rule that someone came up with"? I'm pretty sure that's how every government and every company keeps things in check.

Just a question, is this due to a busy schedule on your part and it's difficult to get on throughout the week?

[KrissKringle]

Common sense dictates if you are paying for something repeatedly, you should read the ToS. And you shouldn't reference something you have not read, that just shows lack of understanding.

Oh, and "reference a rule that someone came up with"? I'm pretty sure that's how every government and every company keeps things in check.

Just a question, is this due to a busy schedule on your part and it's difficult to get on throughout the week?

You are wrong, there are empirical studies that disprove this. It is a matter of ideology and principle, not merely "because".

[LilithMakyomo]

You are wrong, there are empirical studies that disprove this. It is a matter of ideology and principle, not merely "because".

I have referenced empirical studies as a whole, who has time to read those when I am entitled to my rights? Stop hiding behind written doctrine and ideology.

It's a fun game to play, isn't it?

[KrissKringle]

I have referenced empirical studies as a whole, who has time to read those when I am entitled to my rights? Stop hiding behind written doctrine and ideology.

It's a fun game to play, isn't it?

To be fair, aren't you the one hiding behind doctrine and ideology? You literally are referencing rules that have been indoctrinated into society because of an intense ideology. I am simply arguing against it by saying perhaps I should get what I pay for.

[Kuwagami]

To be fair, aren't you the one hiding behind doctrine and ideology? You literally are referencing rules that have been indoctrinated into society because of an intense ideology. I am simply arguing against it by saying perhaps I should get what I pay for.

You already have what you pay for FFS...

You paid for that maintenance. Wether it pleases you or not is none other business than your own

[KrissKringle]

You already have what you pay for FFS...

You paid for that maintenance. Wether it pleases you or not is none other business than your own

Please feel free to actually read the other posts that have been made as to not waste your energy.

[Kuwagami]

Please feel free to actually read the other posts that have been made as to not waste your energy.

You not being aware or willingfully ignoring what you pay for because you have faith in a "greater truth" does not put you above the rules you agreed to follow.

[LilithMakyomo]

To be fair, aren't you the one hiding behind doctrine and ideology? You literally are referencing rules that have been indoctrinated into society because of an intense ideology. I am simply arguing against it by saying perhaps I should get what I pay for.

I have a wall of text that I abide by, and you have a false sense of entitlement that is only there due to a bunch of people thinking they deserve more. Technically, if the rules weren't in place, you would absolutely be right about all this.

[KrissKringle]

I have a wall of text that I abide by, and you have a false sense of entitlement that is only there due to a bunch of people thinking they deserve more. Technically, if the rules weren't in place, you would absolutely be right about all this.

How is it a false sense of entitlement? It really just seems like you're telling me to shut up, along with everyone else who doesn't quite understand this concept. Almost all arguments I have seen have just been insults.

[LilithMakyomo]

How is it a false sense of entitlement? It really just seems like you're telling me to shut up, along with everyone else who doesn't quite understand this concept. Almost all arguments I have seen have just been insults.

No, I'm not. You are asking for more than what you agreed to pay for. That is a form of being entitled just because you pay for something. Why is it so bad that rules have to be in place for something?