Please put a range limitation on shield lob / tomahawk

[Rbstr]

Still: Why? Are you angry people use it when close up or something?

If they're lob-spaming things in range or something they're bad tanks. Keeping them from lobbing won't really help...

[Symbiant]

Still: Why? Are you angry people use it when close up or something?

If they're lob-spaming things in range or something they're bad tanks. Keeping them from lobbing won't really help...

I never said anything about being angry about it. I just said I would like it changed.

It's a ranged attack and imo if you are in melee then it is not ranged. It's more of discrepancy issue then anything.

[Riepah]

It's a ranged attack and imo if you are in melee then it is not ranged. It's more of discrepancy issue then anything.

Then any attack of Archer or Bard would need a minimum range by that logic. And, honestly, don't you find it much weirder that we can throw our shield/axe and... well, hold it in hand again 1 second later? We can throw our shield/axe ten times in a row, but it only bothers you that we can do it in melee range, not that we seem to have limitless amounts of shields/axes to throw?

[Lord_Zlatan]

I never said anything about being angry about it. I just said I would like it changed.

It's a ranged attack and imo if you are in melee then it is not ranged. It's more of discrepancy issue then anything.

no melee range attacks for BRD