Speculation upon Speculation, I say wait for the Patch then discuss Problems and Concerns eh? I thinks so =)
Speculation upon Speculation, I say wait for the Patch then discuss Problems and Concerns eh? I thinks so =)
And market wards are pretty small caliber compared to a hip instance dungeon in needed calculations. Which actually works against it. Because everything is run on the same spec. Bottlenecking one means bottlenecking everything.Market wards are instanced like 15 times =O idk how many categories there are, Anywho, it is possible if games already do it!
I think when Yoshi said he didnt want a queue he probably ment like how when XIV servers get full and you get put into that login queue, that type of queue. But waiting around until there is a free spot is most likely gunna be the situation.
(Technically MW aren't instances, they're just warp dungeons. 2 people zoning in will see each other)
That means 2 dungeons will require X power, 4 dungeon will require the exact same X power, so will 200 dungeons.
The scalable factor on a server load is disastrous. Thankfully, people don't run instances every waking moment. They won't even notice a limit on a dungeon after the first week.
It's only an issue for those that think meteors will hit their houses. Wait on line for a day, and tomorrow, no one cares.
Last edited by kukurumei; 07-12-2011 at 06:39 AM.
Honestly! Some of these arguments are born out of nothing. No where does it say in either rep responses that you'd be in the instance with other groups. Also, do you really expect the instances to be infinite with this engine? It would be amazing if it could be done, but it can't so move on. A week after the patch it won't be an issue anyway. Are you in that much of a rush to fail an instanced dungeon?![]()
It is still very said you have to wait a week after to release to enjoy new stuff. But ah well its hardly anything compared to the 10ish months I've waited for this game to become anything and I am still waiting, so its no issue to me.And market wards are pretty small caliber compared to a hip instance dungeon in needed calculations. Which actually works against it. Because everything is run on the same spec. Bottlenecking one means bottlenecking everything.
That means 2 dungeons will require X power, 4 dungeon will require the exact same X power, so will 200 dungeons.
The scalable factor on a server load is disastrous. Thankfully, people don't run instances every waking moment. They won't even notice a limit on a dungeon after the first week.
It's only an issue for those that think meteors will hit their houses. Wait on line for a day, and tomorrow, no one cares.
But all the explaining, logic and technical jargon you provide, will not (and should not) stop people from expecting more compared to today's standards.
I'm not even worried, this game does not have the population to even hit a said cap, people be too busy figuring out the quests, doing the quests, or going to the other dungeon. Then people will quit again and there be less competition.
Don't we have enough failing as it is? :P thank god they are squashing that.. because that REALLY got annoying! :PHonestly! Some of these arguments are born out of nothing. No where does it say in either rep responses that you'd be in the instance with other groups. Also, do you really expect the instances to be infinite with this engine? It would be amazing if it could be done, but it can't so move on. A week after the patch it won't be an issue anyway. Are you that much in a rush to fail an instanced dungeon?
Levequests= a Side thing to do
Quest Hubs= Possible the new way of Leveling up?
Dungeons= as it stands the Primary source of getting new gear Weapons, and a Bunch of Mini-games within it? Sounds good to me.
Grand Companies= New Storyline, If Im a betting man I would go with this that They will be the Prime source of the story.
It's funny how this conversation went completely out of hand.
I started the topic cause there was a com rep response that "implied" something like Dynamis, but nothing confirmed, it just sounded confusing and the wording wasn't chosen that well.
Now Bayohne comes in and at least tells us how things are meant to be and that he is trying to get us info about how many groups can enter the dungeon at once. And NOW people get all raged up about Dynamis shit? I mean, when I started the thread, it was all viable to get concerned and stuff, but NOW it just makes no sense anymore...
I agree.. and most threads get out of hand.. sad but true because people take "ONE" word and then try to make a lot of facts up when its not even true. Opinions are good, but when your sounding like your passing them off as fact that's where the line is drawn.It's funny how this conversation went completely out of hand.
I started the topic cause there was a com rep response that "implied" something like Dynamis, but nothing confirmed, it just sounded confusing and the wording wasn't chosen that well.
Now Bayohne comes in and at least tells us how things are meant to be and that he is trying to get us info about how many groups can enter the dungeon at once. And NOW people get all raged up about Dynamis shit? I mean, when I started the thread, it was all viable to get concerned and stuff, but NOW it just makes no sense anymore...
They actually did not imply that. You did. So blame yourself.It's funny how this conversation went completely out of hand.
I started the topic cause there was a com rep response that "implied" something like Dynamis, but nothing confirmed, it just sounded confusing and the wording wasn't chosen that well.
Now Bayohne comes in and at least tells us how things are meant to be and that he is trying to get us info about how many groups can enter the dungeon at once. And NOW people get all raged up about Dynamis shit? I mean, when I started the thread, it was all viable to get concerned and stuff, but NOW it just makes no sense anymore...
"No queue system, it's gonna be "First come, first serve"
What does that imply for you Mr. Know it all? This sure as hell gives me concerns about it not being open to more than one group at a time. Cause if it's more than 1 group, why even mention "First come, first serve"?
And obviously, Bayohne himself thought the concern is viable enough to inquire about clarification...so bang some other Brucey.
Its a Vague statement.. Just wait till Patch day and test it out"No queue system, it's gonna be "First come, first serve"
What does that imply for you Mr. Know it all? This sure as hell gives me concerns about it not being open to more than one group at a time. Cause if it's more than 1 group, why even mention "First come, first serve"?
And obviously, Bayohne himself thought the concern is viable enough to inquire about clarification...so bang some other Brucey.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.