German Com rep response to "reservation system for dungeons".

[Sigmakan]

/Shrug

I was under the assumption that there would be a set amount of instances available (20 maybe?). Each party would fill in one of those instances, once those fill up, its a free for all for whoever is up next. Is this not the case?

From everything I've read, it seems to point to this type of setup.

[Starlord]

Speculation upon Speculation, I say wait for the Patch then discuss Problems and Concerns eh? I thinks so =)

[BruceyBruceyBangBang]

Speculation upon Speculation, I say wait for the Patch then discuss Problems and Concerns eh? I thinks so =)

Honestly! Some of these arguments are born out of nothing. No where does it say in either rep responses that you'd be in the instance with other groups. Also, do you really expect the instances to be infinite with this engine? It would be amazing if it could be done, but it can't so move on. A week after the patch it won't be an issue anyway. Are you in that much of a rush to fail an instanced dungeon?

[Starlord]

Honestly! Some of these arguments are born out of nothing. No where does it say in either rep responses that you'd be in the instance with other groups. Also, do you really expect the instances to be infinite with this engine? It would be amazing if it could be done, but it can't so move on. A week after the patch it won't be an issue anyway. Are you that much in a rush to fail an instanced dungeon?

Don't we have enough failing as it is? :P thank god they are squashing that.. because that REALLY got annoying! :P

Levequests= a Side thing to do
Quest Hubs= Possible the new way of Leveling up?
Dungeons= as it stands the Primary source of getting new gear Weapons, and a Bunch of Mini-games within it? Sounds good to me.

Grand Companies= New Storyline, If Im a betting man I would go with this that They will be the Prime source of the story.

[TirionCrey]

It's funny how this conversation went completely out of hand.

I started the topic cause there was a com rep response that "implied" something like Dynamis, but nothing confirmed, it just sounded confusing and the wording wasn't chosen that well.

Now Bayohne comes in and at least tells us how things are meant to be and that he is trying to get us info about how many groups can enter the dungeon at once. And NOW people get all raged up about Dynamis shit? I mean, when I started the thread, it was all viable to get concerned and stuff, but NOW it just makes no sense anymore...

[Starlord]

It's funny how this conversation went completely out of hand.

I started the topic cause there was a com rep response that "implied" something like Dynamis, but nothing confirmed, it just sounded confusing and the wording wasn't chosen that well.

Now Bayohne comes in and at least tells us how things are meant to be and that he is trying to get us info about how many groups can enter the dungeon at once. And NOW people get all raged up about Dynamis shit? I mean, when I started the thread, it was all viable to get concerned and stuff, but NOW it just makes no sense anymore...

I agree.. and most threads get out of hand.. sad but true because people take "ONE" word and then try to make a lot of facts up when its not even true. Opinions are good, but when your sounding like your passing them off as fact that's where the line is drawn.

[BruceyBruceyBangBang]

It's funny how this conversation went completely out of hand.

I started the topic cause there was a com rep response that "implied" something like Dynamis, but nothing confirmed, it just sounded confusing and the wording wasn't chosen that well.

Now Bayohne comes in and at least tells us how things are meant to be and that he is trying to get us info about how many groups can enter the dungeon at once. And NOW people get all raged up about Dynamis shit? I mean, when I started the thread, it was all viable to get concerned and stuff, but NOW it just makes no sense anymore...

They actually did not imply that. You did. So blame yourself.

[TirionCrey]

They actually did not imply that. You did. So blame yourself.

"No queue system, it's gonna be "First come, first serve"

What does that imply for you Mr. Know it all? This sure as hell gives me concerns about it not being open to more than one group at a time. Cause if it's more than 1 group, why even mention "First come, first serve"?

And obviously, Bayohne himself thought the concern is viable enough to inquire about clarification...so bang some other Brucey.

[Starlord]

"No queue system, it's gonna be "First come, first serve"

What does that imply for you Mr. Know it all? This sure as hell gives me concerns about it not being open to more than one group at a time. Cause if it's more than 1 group, why even mention "First come, first serve"?

And obviously, Bayohne himself thought the concern is viable enough to inquire about clarification...so bang some other Brucey.

Its a Vague statement.. Just wait till Patch day and test it out

[BruceyBruceyBangBang]

"No queue system, it's gonna be "First come, first serve"

What does that imply for you Mr. Know it all? This sure as hell gives me concerns about it not being open to more than one group at a time. Cause if it's more than 1 group, why even mention "First come, first serve"?

And obviously, Bayohne himself thought the concern is viable enough to inquire about clarification...so bang some other Brucey.

Several interviews and mentions to the instanced dungeons have talks regarding issues that they are planning on taking for the sever load. Remember the issue where players disliked the fact that you needed 8 players to enter the R45+ dungeon? Remember the reasoning Yoshida gave for this issue? Go read that. Don't walk out of here criticizing players who are also jumping the gun when you just made an issue out of something that was already described as not the case straight from the horse's mouth a month ago. On top of taking an extremely vague comment and suggesting it implies something. You had a thought that was separate from what the rep was saying and applied it to the comment.