
Your describing the free company housing as YOUR house. It is not YOURS its the companies. Its shared by MORE THAN 1 person. Therefore, having at least 1 person log in is fairthe thing is they aren't different things.
unless you wanna get techincal and say one is your character and one is your house,in the end you work hard to make your character build it and get attached.
same goes for your house you get the money you buy the land you buy a house you put things in it and you get attached,the only you you're saying is different is resource usage characters use less so it's not ok to get rid of them but since housing takes up more it's ok.
no it's not. if the game developers made it so only so many characters could be made in total and if a character wasn't used in a certain amount of time it would be a problem but since it's just a house it's ok?
in the end to make it seem reasonable you will use resource usage as a excuse for them to do this.


to bad it is mine. there is 2 people in my fc and who own our fc house my gf and me.
but that isn't the point.
it's not fair because you will take it in the first place you shouldn't have to take the house.
resources isn't an excuse for taking someones stuff in game, why put something in the game and say it's open for any fc that can buy it and you will add more wards if you don't have the resources for all those fc's or more wards.
Two people? Seriously?
This is FC housing, not personal housing. You should have lied and said there were three of you just so you could use the "Well SE lets you form a FC with just three people so that's how many are intended to buy a house" argument someone tossed out at some point.


why? i don't need to lie it's our house just the two of us.Two people? Seriously?
This is FC housing, not personal housing. You should have lied and said there were three of you just so you could use the "Well SE lets you form a FC with just three people so that's how many are intended to buy a house" argument someone tossed out at some point.
this isn't about not being able to enter the house. it's about taking something from a player.
in no situation should you take something from a player because they weren't actively playing. be it housing, characters or anything else.
server resources have nothing to do with the argument other then telling people they should suck it up.
Technically speaking they're taking absolutely nothing from you. You don't own a single thing in this game. Your subscription is like rent for the server space SE uses to store your character. You have no right to the data what so ever, it isn't "your" character or "your" house.
And to get even more technical they how are they taking something from the "player" when the "player" doesn't play? It's one thing if SE just indiscriminately decided to delete the belongs of someone that is actively playing the game but here we're talking about someone that hasn't actually "played" the game for more than a month.
And for the love of god could you please stop trying to compare this to deleting a player character already?

And here we see exactly the problem. You bought it to have "personal housing" and it IS NOT, NOR WAS IT, NOR WILL IT EVER BE PERSONAL HOUSING. That was not it intent, and your mad because YOU view it as something it is not. Thats your problem in its entirety. If you cant see it, your blinded by being pissed off.


mad? just because i said you would be pissed over losing a character doesn't mean i am mad about losing a house.And here we see exactly the problem. You bought it to have "personal housing" and it IS NOT, NOR WAS IT, NOR WILL IT EVER BE PERSONAL HOUSING. That was not it intent, and your mad because YOU view it as something it is not. Thats your problem in its entirety. If you cant see it, your blinded by being pissed off.
i am merely arguing that taking something from a player is wrong and shouldn't ever happen.
the entirety of the problem is taking something away that shouldn't be at risk of losing. idc if i had a fullly active 24/7 512 member fc.
once a house is bought, be it fc or personal it should be that persons or fc's forever even if it dies and everyone in it stops playing. if they wanna log on in 5 years that house should still be there waiting for them.

I give up. You obviously wont see the fallacy in your argument so its worthless to try to convince you otherwise.mad? just because i said you would be pissed over losing a character doesn't mean i am mad about losing a house.
i am merely arguing that taking something from a player is wrong and shouldn't ever happen.
the entirety of the problem is taking something away that shouldn't be at risk of losing. idc if i had a fullly active 24/7 512 member fc.


you say there is fallacy but all you scream is resource usage resource usage.
resources shouldn't be a problem adding something to the game that it can't handle is clearly a design flaw.

Actually I pointed out how your character and a house are totally different things and require different resources, since a character is only active when your online and using it and a house is permanently up. I didn't scream anything. You are clearly mad and not able to see that those are true statements and that they are NOT similar things.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


