Results -9 to 0 of 70

Threaded View

  1. #26
    Player
    Gesser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    New Gridania
    Posts
    728
    Character
    Saedrin Nightfury
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 94
    Quote Originally Posted by kukurumei View Post
    No it was intended, you not liking it doesn't mean it's bad.
    1) it wasn't intended. CT was meant to be released at launch but they had to postpone it.

    2) he never said he disliked it nor did he 'necessarily' say it was bad.

    3) please don't create grave assumptions & in doing so disrupt the useful conversation.

    On-Topic: like I said in my original post... I'm all for having an achievable 24-man for the casual crowd. I just feel a 24-man should exist that is moderately challenging (as opposed to CT's pathetically easy steamrolling) for somewhat larger FC's to be able to play all together. As it is, FC's of even low-medium size are forcibly segregated into 8-man static divisions.

    It's no fun having 11 friends on & having to leave 3 of them out to fend for themselves & etc. Even if CT were to implement all-FC queue (planned), it's no fun for any decently we'll geared groups after you've stomped it with ease a thousand times over. Which will continue if they don't break the cycle somehow or introduce a finer challenge in the 24-man bracket.

    I have been thinking however... I would be totally fine with 16-man rather than 24, which I think would make for a fine compromise.

    Not too hard to manage nor collect members, could be ever so slightly 'easier' than BC to accommodate for the increased # of participants. It could drop interim gear between that of 24-man CT & 8-man BC (i85).

    Thoughts?
    (1)
    Last edited by Gesser; 03-21-2014 at 02:27 AM.