[dev1079][Poll] Do you want CAPPED dungeons, or uncapped?

[Perrin_Aybarra]

its simple actualy, if ALL your jobs over over 50 you shouldnt care about lower dungeons

you should be asking for more higher dungeons instead

Again not everything is about YOU. If all your classes are at 50 but you want to help a friend lower level without ruining the learning experience and the challenge for them, what do you do?

[Azurus]

Again not everything is about YOU. If all your classes are at 50 but you want to help a friend lower level without ruining the learning experience and the challenge for them, what do you do?

if you are 50 running a 25 through the dungeon you ARE ruining the challenge and learning experience for them. you cut out the whole point of GROUP content by having them clear things without an actual group. If you just want to be run through dungeons by higher level ppl thats lame.

[Yoohre_WildRiver]

if you are 50 running a 25 through the dungeon you ARE ruining the challenge and learning experience for them. you cut out the whole point of GROUP content by having them clear things without an actual group. If you just want to be run through dungeons by higher level ppl thats lame.

i think he meant help his friend as a r25 also in a group of 25s not as a r50 running a r25

[Perrin_Aybarra]

if you are 50 running a 25 through the dungeon you ARE ruining the challenge and learning experience for them. you cut out the whole point of GROUP content by having them clear things without an actual group. If you just want to be run through dungeons by higher level ppl thats lame.

Why are you quoting me like I want that? I said exactly what you said many times. I am all in favor of cap so you don't ruin lower level experience. Being against a cap is being lame since their only argument is that if they want to steamroll content they should be allowed to and they don't say it but they probably think that SE OWES it to them.

[Yoohre_WildRiver]

Why are you quoting me like I want that? I said exactly what you said many times. I am all in favor of cap so you don't ruin lower level experience. Being against a cap is being lame since their only argument is that if they want to steamroll content they should be allowed to and they don't say it but they probably think that SE OWES it to them.

ummm im against a cap, and thats not my argument.

[Perrin_Aybarra]

ummm im against a cap, and thats not my argument.

Not going to quote your past posts but all I remember you providing to this debate is that:

1- If people want a challenge they can make their own challenge and go the appropriate level. If they are level 50 they can go on another class. If they just want to go for the story/lore on their 50 they can go

-->Some people don't want to level up multiple classes and may already have several over the "challenging" level.

2-Storage issue.

--> Already explained that gears and their stats could be adjusted to the right level, could be well done.

Part of the first argument is a bit like " if they want to steamroll content they should be allowed to and they don't say it but they probably think that SE OWES it to them."

Edit: Actually I went back

ok so let me get this Straight. people want a lvl cap for the challenge so other ppl who would like to do it R50 maybe just for the lore would have to have a challenge to? i mean if you want a challenge then use a r30!!! if other people want to do it @r50 is none of your buissness, stop crying for trivial stuff and let people be, want a challenge?

that's pretty much the same argument the people against a cap are using over and over: SE HAS TO LET ME DO THINGS THE WAY I WANT TO BECAUSE I DESERVE IT AND THEY OWE IT TO ME.

[TheVedis]

Again not everything is about YOU. If all your classes are at 50 but you want to help a friend lower level without ruining the learning experience and the challenge for them, what do you do?

no its not all about me

apperently its all about YOU
and how YOU want to make others experience the content

if YOU want to do it at 30, do it at 30

but you are telling others they have to do it your way, cuz thats how YOU want them to do it

YOU dont want them to choose how to do it

[Richard]

no its not all about me

apperently its all about YOU
and how YOU want to make others experience the content

if YOU want to do it at 30, do it at 30

but you are telling others they have to do it your way, cuz thats how YOU want them to do it

YOU dont want them to choose how to do it

why are you still arguing this point? The consensus is for an optional system. give it a rest.

[DurtiMonkeyToe]

why are you still arguing this point? The consensus is for an optional system. give it a rest.

It doesn't matter what the consensus is. In the end, it is up to the Devs.

[Perrin_Aybarra]

It doesn't matter what the consensus is. In the end, it is up to the Devs.

True, but the devs are influenced by the concensus.