http://www.reddit.com/r/ffxiv/commen...onal_and_will/And aparently it is a bug.http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/f...11#post1887811
I expect a translated version later.
But you can all rest peacefully now.
Oh boy we're getting to the flimsy self-justification posts that fool no one and incredibly stretched analogies. what is normally next in this tired, circular debate?
maybe that your arrogant remarks and 3 dollar words will not change the fact that i just might have a point regarding certain players' hypocrisy.
Last edited by joshsecret; 02-21-2014 at 04:08 PM.
Hey there, he himself just posted on jp side, looks like it may be a mistake, and wasnt them tryingI couldnt care less about the buff, but I'm severely disappointed in the honesty that Yoshi-P and his team have displayed to us after saying weeks ago that it wasn't an exploit and they weren't going to mess with it.
If they don't publicly apologize about the blatant lying they are going to lose a whole lot of respect within their community and that is something you do NOT want with a game this young.
to hide things. We'll see though, how they proceed. But looks like it could be the response some
people were after. not saying they didnt make any changes, but it seems it wasnt what they intended.
here
we can agree to disagree then.
because as far as i see it, if you were to negate the intended mechanics if T2 by doing the Enraged version then how can you justify running through the entire run of T3 without engaging any enemies and call it 'working as intended'?
bottom line, if you bypass T3 mobs then you have no room to complain whether or not people ignore the original mechanics of T2.
my argument was that i believed that more than half of the people that get on these forums and try to look down on those that use the enrage tactic actually exploit T3, therefore are being hypocritical.
beyond these things that i have, for the last time, stated; why does it concern anyone how a particular person runs a certain turn? this will all be moot within a month's time and all that will be left is
![]()
So...when they were designing T2 and debugging it, do you think they brought 3 healers, a tank, and 4 DPS to the fight or used their intended 2 tanks, 2 healers, and 4 DPS setup that they have stressed over and over again (even suggesting it would be more like 2 tanks, 2 healers, 2 DPS, and 2 support when implemented). See, there wasn't a question mark on the end of that statement because it wasn't needed.
No loot is rewarded on turn 3. Maybe...just maybe...they intended turn 3 to be a bit less serious. It's easy enough to lock the switches from being used until the trash near them has been cleared, you know?
Anyways, at least you can justify to yourself why you cheapen the mechanics of the game you pay to play. Good on you.
Also, since we're linking unrelated imagery:
![]()
By that logic, people have been doing Titan HM for relic the "wrong" way almost since the encounter came out...So...when they were designing T2 and debugging it, do you think they brought 3 healers, a tank, and 4 DPS to the fight or used their intended 2 tanks, 2 healers, and 4 DPS setup that they have stressed over and over again (even suggesting it would be more like 2 tanks, 2 healers, 2 DPS, and 2 support when implemented). See, there wasn't a question mark on the end of that statement because it wasn't needed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.