If you think it's bad now, wait until the devs throw in a little stress into the game. It's already started to snowball. Two powerful jobs stay powerful. The players get bolder and bolder in testing the power of those jobs. Jobs that aren't involved try to posture that they're good in response to not getting as much attention as they used to. This comes across as lolsy to those two jobs in power, so they start to make fun of a glad's uselessness and a mrd's unreliability. The jobs in power start eliminating the jobs without power just to make a point--that those jobs have no real use.
It becomes a who'se right and who'se wrong issue, and at that point thaumaturges and archers will just pwn the other jobs and prove them wrong out of spite.
Same thing happened in XI.
The first time you get together a group of archers, it's not to spite gladiators. It's just to see how it goes.
It goes phenomenally.
The second time you get together a group of archers, it's to reproduce that success you didn't get any other way.
At this point gladiators start protesting. They start posturing that they're great and that archers suck.
At that point it's personal, and it's over.
The next archer party is just to spite that foolish gladiator for ever thinking he was useful to anyone.
Horrible things are about to happen all over again.
Again the steps are:
Imbalance is present
It isn't corrected
Players test the extent of the imbalance
And grow accustomed to its successes
Which draws protests from those not included
Fanboys of a job give favored jobs opportunity to strawman the entire unwanted job as even more unwanted.
They stop involving 2nd class jobs out of a new principle and to teach them a lesson.
The 2nd class jobs sit in town, having lost the argument that they were useful when they never had a chance.
They will say,
"I don't have anything against Gladiators, just ones that think they're useful."
"Hey I didn't make marauder gimp, I just play the game the way it's designed."
Only thing to stop that from happening is to balance the jobs.

Reply With Quote










