Dragoons: A Rotation Reborn

[KrystalF]

Thanks for the new findings on the weights, glad det is much more valued now.

Since people really like to have different accuracy stats I calculated BiS for 482 to 460 accuracy and also 0 accuracy (extremes require shit accuracy)

BiS
http://pastie.org/private/qpfxgvdvj1hmlkxiwt5tq

Pre T5 with Extremes BiS
http://pastie.org/8614681#1

Pre T5 BiS
http://pastie.org/private/u93gaqcronr969rbbmh8q

Hope this helps some or brings more confusion.

[AugustusSB]

Thanks for the new findings on the weights, glad det is much more valued now.

Since people really like to have different accuracy stats I calculated BiS for 482 to 460 accuracy and also 0 accuracy (extremes require shit accuracy)

BiS
http://pastie.org/private/qpfxgvdvj1hmlkxiwt5tq

Pre T5 with Extremes BiS
http://pastie.org/8614681#1

Pre T5 BiS
http://pastie.org/private/u93gaqcronr969rbbmh8q

Hope this helps some or brings more confusion.

Oooo, these links are nice, thanks for the iterations :P

[Ayvar]

Thanks for the new findings on the weights, glad det is much more valued now.

Since people really like to have different accuracy stats I calculated BiS for 482 to 460 accuracy and also 0 accuracy (extremes require shit accuracy)

BiS
http://pastie.org/private/qpfxgvdvj1hmlkxiwt5tq

Pre T5 with Extremes BiS
http://pastie.org/8614681#1

Pre T5 BiS
http://pastie.org/private/u93gaqcronr969rbbmh8q

Hope this helps some or brings more confusion.

Thanks for this, I'll just link the main post to these.

[Nash]

Thanks for the new findings on the weights, glad det is much more valued now.

Since people really like to have different accuracy stats I calculated BiS for 482 to 460 accuracy and also 0 accuracy (extremes require shit accuracy)

BiS
http://pastie.org/private/qpfxgvdvj1hmlkxiwt5tq

Pre T5 with Extremes BiS
http://pastie.org/8614681#1

Pre T5 BiS
http://pastie.org/private/u93gaqcronr969rbbmh8q

Hope this helps some or brings more confusion.

Awesome list. I have access to all of the gear in the BiS 470 accuracy set, so I'll use that to parse my next Coil run next Monday and post the results. I'm going with that set because I've parsed some misses in Turn 4 with 469 accuracy (particularly with Ring of Thorns during the bug aoe phases). Unfortunately, I don't have those logs to post here anymore. If I register any misses (other than snakes/mini-wyverns in T5) I'll have to spend some myth to go up and test the 471/472 accuracy sets the following weeks. Thanks!

[Crush3r07]

Thanks for the new findings on the weights, glad det is much more valued now.

Since people really like to have different accuracy stats I calculated BiS for 482 to 460 accuracy and also 0 accuracy (extremes require shit accuracy)

BiS
http://pastie.org/private/qpfxgvdvj1hmlkxiwt5tq

Pre T5 with Extremes BiS
http://pastie.org/8614681#1

Pre T5 BiS
http://pastie.org/private/u93gaqcronr969rbbmh8q

Hope this helps some or brings more confusion.

Interesting to see that no accuracy is only 7-9 dps better than BIS depending on which accuracy you're aiming for.

[Dervy]

Thanks for the new findings on the weights, glad det is much more valued now.

Since people really like to have different accuracy stats I calculated BiS for 482 to 460 accuracy and also 0 accuracy (extremes require shit accuracy)

BiS
http://pastie.org/private/qpfxgvdvj1hmlkxiwt5tq

Pre T5 with Extremes BiS
http://pastie.org/8614681#1

Pre T5 BiS
http://pastie.org/private/u93gaqcronr969rbbmh8q

Hope this helps some or brings more confusion.

Interesting how despite we both come to the same gear sets on all accuracy requirements, my scores are slightly higher than the ones you've calculated...

Concerning the BiS list, every calculation tends to give the following as 463 (465 in fact) :
- Wyrm's Armet
- Wyrm's mail
- Allagan Gauntlets of maiming (T2)
- Hero's belt of maiming
- Allagan trousers of maiming (T1)
- Allagan Sollerets of maiming (T5)
- Allagan choker of striking (T2)
- Earthquake's Earrings
- Hero's Braclet of Slaying
- Allagan ring of striking (T4)
- Allagan ring of maiming (T4)

I don't know if it's because I'm running it under Excel 2007 and not 2010 but the solver is acting very weird. I have to run it multiple times as it doesn't always find the same result. Do you have the same behavior Dervy?

Anyway we won't have a real BiS list as long as we can't confirm the Acc's cap for T5.

Not at all :O I don't see it giving me different results. But that set you've posted is what I've come to, same for KrystalF.

[KrystalF]

Interesting how despite we both come to the same gear sets on all accuracy requirements, my scores are slightly higher than the ones you've calculated...

If you mean in scores like 694.9879999999999 or 714.8249999999998 you got 694.988 and 714.825 then yea, it is because I have been using float/double numbers in my app and they're not accurate 100% and would kinda need to some rounding I guess but I didn't really bother. If you got scores much more different than that let me know

[JetBrooks]

Thanks for the new findings on the weights, glad det is much more valued now.

Since people really like to have different accuracy stats I calculated BiS for 482 to 460 accuracy and also 0 accuracy (extremes require shit accuracy)

BiS
http://pastie.org/private/qpfxgvdvj1hmlkxiwt5tq

Pre T5 with Extremes BiS
http://pastie.org/8614681#1

Pre T5 BiS
http://pastie.org/private/u93gaqcronr969rbbmh8q

Hope this helps some or brings more confusion.

Thanks so much for these!

Can you run one with CT Gear, Pre-T5? A lot of people will be in this boat for a while, and I'm curious if some goofy stat weight combinations may make CT gear the most viable for the time being.

[Ayvar]

Finally got around to adding Krystals lists and the new stat weights from EMX, sorry for the delay. I'll get around to changing the DoT section eventually, haven't decided if I want to just adjust it, erase entirely, or replace with something else.

This is my parser from T5 tonight with 472 accuracy. I hope it will help us to know how much accuracy needed for end game later.
regards

Thank you for this! Very interesting to see misses at 472 since none of the other parses show this, my own included. Now I have to decide if I want to do a low 460's parse tonight, or do a second one at 473. I wish I had multiple Dragoons to run T5 with.

May I ask, and I do apologise if it's been asked multiple times, but which is more accurate for parsing; FFXIV-App or LogRep?

I've been using FFXIV-App for a while now, but I always see LogRep parsings here.

LogRep is just nice for accuracy because it shows almost all of the relevant information on one screen. It gives job, parse duration, what mobs were hit, total damage done on each mob (which shows relatively how much time in the parse was spent actually hitting each mob), and miss % for all

Was wondering what avg DPS should DRG be parsing prior to snakes, anyone have any dps parse data for drg prior to snake phase from T5? Thanks.

It's tough because I always find the parsers inflate my dps, LogRep2 consistently shows me at 350+ dps on T5 and extremes, which is stupid. ACT is probably going to be the best for your personal numbers, I'll try to get an idea of what I'm doing pre-snakes tonight with ACT.