2.1 PLD snooze fest Flash

[Synestra]

Due to this PLD required a buff to keep enmity on par between the 2 jobs.

I tought it was due enmity modifier didnt work properly on Shield Oath in 2.0, not sure if it was actually bugged or not but there was discussions about it here on forums.

[Leiron]

Wasn't bugged, it just meant shield Oath Paladins generated less enmity than they should have.

[Yunnie]

Flash has abruptly too much hate that a monk nor a drg can take hate from me at all.. nor even a BLM nor SMN AOE can take away..

anyone encounter this?

Tell me how well this works during turn 4.... when the solider and knight spawn... I would love to hear your success story. (please bring a monk, drg, blm and smn to help with the data).

[misterdapi]

Are we really talking about how a gear capped Paladin is bored in WP? Trololololo

Go use your free time to write some theorycraft on things to do with all your extra free time now that you don't have to work for threat.

3/10

[Duelle]

I like, love you (for this post) and stuff.

[Sinaloa]

I think one reason could be with duty finder groups. Any non-relic tank knows how much of a bitch it is to keep aggro off a relic + 1 BLM without them having to throttle their dps. It lessens the penalty when there is a gear gap between your tank and DPS. Otherwise, all things equal, yes, with equally geared tank/DPS/healer, a tank had no problems holding threat in 2.0.

My bet is that a Paladin in swordoath was generating more enmity than one in shieldoath. I would have given the Paladin a passive at lvl 45 reducing enmity by 10% in swo. But that would have required additional programlines and a picture. So they just changed a number.

[Ezikiel]

LMAO this had me crying i can see the butthurt on OP face now. This just makes it so real LOL please don't complain when a job works the way its supposed to.

[Giantbane]

LMAO this had me crying i can see the butthurt on OP face now. This just makes it so real LOL please don't complain when a job works the way its supposed to.

Lets take an extreme example.


How about you took WHM & SCH, and:

Triple potency on all heals
Reduce threat generated by 90%
Reduce my costs by 75%

Would you say that's awesome that the healers can now keep everyone alive like they're supposed to? Or would you say that maybe it's a little much and this is starting to get a little too easy?

[Leiron]

Lets take an extreme example.


How about you took WHM & SCH, and:

Triple potency on all heals
Reduce threat generated by 90%
Reduce my costs by 75%

Would you say that's awesome that the healers can now keep everyone alive like they're supposed to? Or would you say that maybe it's a little much and this is starting to get a little too easy?

That is a terrible example that isn't at all comparable to the current state of things.

2.0= tanks don't lose threat
2.1= tanks still don't lose threat.

There is no difference.

To take your example of WHM& SCH
It would be these

SCH & WHM: Healing spells have a new graphic.

Your example is one where gameplay is actually changed, but the enmity changes haven't done that in this case.
WAR and PLD still play the same way.
The exception beig WAR which has new tools which DOES change gameplay.

[Giantbane]

That is a terrible example that isn't at all comparable to the current state of things.

2.0= tanks don't lose threat
2.1= tanks still don't lose threat.

There is no difference.

To take your example of WHM& SCH
It would be these

SCH & WHM: Healing spells have a new graphic.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/extreme?s=t

I would ask you to come back when you get it, but then you'd never be back

errr, wait ... hmmmm ...