First article about the House pricing.

[Abriael]

Abriael, as another mentioned, you don't have to defend your blog post. It is very evident from the community that a huge chunk (and I don't even care if it's over half, though I would put money on it being well over that) of players are unhappy with the pricing. Those defending it aren't likely to be swayed as they keep throwing up strawman arguments.

Oh don't worry I'm not really defending my post, as much as discussing. I don't enjoy seeing people trying to obscure reality to defend bad design and elitism.

Here's the problem. You're using really bad argumentation to support your assertion. Resorting to logical fallacies and anecdotal evidence is not the way to go.

You saying that an argumentation is a bad argumentation doesn't automatically make it so.

The voice of the customer is very relevant when talking about a product, and even more so when talking about a product that requires continued payments. The fact that a very relevant area of the playerbase is very dissatisfied by how the feature is being handled is evident to anyone that has eyes, and it goes a lot beyond this forum.

You can keep throwing around dialectical tricks for the sake of arguing as much as you want, but that doesn't change.