Monks very weak. Need rebalance

[neoreturn]

Turn 2 with LB3

Dude, you used LB3, remove 30k Dmg, you are below other DPS.

[Valsh]

Dude, you used LB3, remove 30k Dmg, you are below other DPS.

LB3 hits for 12-15k. He's still significantly above everyone, on a fight that is not completely melee friendly. T.K.O.

[Maroite]

LB3 hits for 12-15k. He's still significantly above everyone, on a fight that is not completely melee friendly. T.K.O.

You really have no clue how DPS is calculated do you? If you hit for 12-15k in ONE hit its going to substantially increase your DPS and F up the reading.

[Genesiser]

You really have no clue how DPS is calculated do you? If you hit for 12-15k in ONE hit its going to substantially increase your DPS and F up the reading.

The fight was 187 seconds long (61,000 dmg / 331 dps). Remove 15,000 damage and instead of doing 331 dps he did 245 dps. Considering 2nd place dps did 187 dps, he still did 58 more dps compared to 2nd place. That is still 31% more dps than the 2nd place guy.

Now granted, he may have much better gear than the other guy, but still; 31% more damage is pretty impressive.

[Maroite]

The fight was 187 seconds long (61,000 dmg / 331 dps). Remove 15,000 damage and instead of doing 331 dps he did 245 dps. Considering 2nd place dps did 187 dps, he still did 58 more dps compared to 2nd place. That is still 31% more dps than the 2nd place guy.

Now granted, he may have much better gear than the other guy, but still; 31% more damage is pretty impressive.

187 seconds for the monk but 204 for the other DPS? Seems like something is off. Not to mention you should refer to Rhained's post on page 25.

[Valsh]

You really have no clue how DPS is calculated do you? If you hit for 12-15k in ONE hit its going to substantially increase your DPS and F up the reading.

Do they not teach basic maths in school?

LB3 has what a 3 second cast? So thats 4000-5000 DPS skewing the data. It still completely throws off DPS and you don't lose GL during LB3. I use LB3 on Titan all the time and am easily able to keep up GL.

That's not how it works, you can completely remove the limit break from the parse by deducting the damage from his total damage 61900-15000 > all other players.

It's shocking that you think the data is skewed by "4000-5000 DPS", that would have been true if the fight lasts 3 seconds and consisted of him only limit breaking, fortunately it didn't and even without the limit break he is a good amount higher than everyone else on total damage and as a result DPS.

[Maroite]

...

Obviously you never picked up manners or etiquette but mastered in insults/trolling...

If you hit something for 13000-15000 damage your DPS will jump significantly and then slowly diminish over time as your "normal" dps begins to accumulate. So if you are doing 150 DPS the entire fight and then all of a sudden hit something for 15000 at the end of the fight your DPS is definitely going to be skewed. That damage can't just be "subtracted" from the total and the DPS recalculated like that.

Not to mention that even if you did do it your way his dps wouldn't be THAT much better than the other DPS in the party - maybe 20 points max, AND it means little considering that we don't know the circumstances or ability of the other DPS.

[EasymodeX]

That damage can't just be "subtracted" from the total and the DPS recalculated like that.

Uh, yes it can.

Edit: as long as you also subtract the matching amount of time spent.

[Valsh]

Obviously you never picked up manners or etiquette but mastered in insults/trolling...
That damage can't just be "subtracted" from the total and the DPS recalculated like that. .

Yes it can.

The maths was done for you at the bottom of the last page, not sure how much bluntly you want it given to you. Perhaps whilst you're in the mood for learning you should also look up the definition of insult and troll. Neither of which apply to me asking if you're capable of basic maths. It was originally a question, now it's a statement, you are not capable of basic maths.