Quote Originally Posted by HiirNoivl View Post
If you played WAR correctly your math doesn't add up. I can use 2 IBs in one Berserk so that totals to between 3500 to 5800 HP regenned and half the time I don't even need that much! lol
You can use 2 IBs in Inner Beast if you also have Infuriate up. It takes 7 GCDs to get Infuriated, assuming you start partway into a combo, and you need 2 more GCDs to use Inner Beast. This means that, in the absolute best case, you need 9 GCDs. Unless your GCD has been brought down to 2.22 seconds (which is 12.5% from Skill Speed), you're talking out of your ass.

The way you talk about using Inner Beast, it is mathematically *impossible* for every single one that you use (and you claim to use it every 20-30 seconds) to be buffed with Berserk. *Mathematically impossible*. Unless you admit that Inner Beast is only useful once every 60-90 seconds rather than every flipping 20 seconds, you're talking out of your ass yet again. Seriously, you don't even try to confront the math; you just pull impossible numbers out of your ass and hope that it sticks.

My rotations insure that my IBs are buffed, no worries.
Because it perturbs me and you perturb me even more, if what you're saying is true, your rotation *ensures* that all of your IBs are buffed. If IB is insuring that all of your IBs are buffed, you'd be getting a monetary payout every time that it didn't. You're not that good with English, are you?

What WARs have to do is catch hate on multi targets and DPS the bejeezus off of one and kill it to mitigate the damage through self healing and the "Death" debuff.
Once again, you're saying that WAR somehow has magical uber-DPS capabilities that the PLD doesn't have. PLD has DPS that is just as good as a WAR. Hell, if you're saving Berserk for times when you need Inner Beast, which you apparently always do, you're going to do *less* damage than a PLD because you're not ensuring maximum contribution from Berserk.

It's getting annoying having to constantly point out exactly how wrong you are and how you keep using the same arguments that have been demonstrably proven to be untrue time and time again. Saying something over and over again doesn't make it true, no matter how hard you try. It just makes you look like an idiot desperate to salvage some kind of relevance when he's discovered that his position is completely and utterly wrong. Hell, you're resorting to strawman arguments because you don't know how to *actually* counteract the fact that I keep bringing up the *impossibility* of your statements.