Bard limit break does not make sense

[Reiterpallasch]

You will always have a tank, and therefore always have the tank limit break.
You will always have a healer, and therefore always have the healer limit break.
You won't always have anything other than BRDs in your group though, so you won't always have the DPS limit break.

Excuses like "but what if both healers are dead?!" are shitty arguments, because it means the group messed up badly and is going to wipe anyways, or is just plain bad to begin with. Don't try to justify BRD having the wrong limit break based on situations that shouldn't be happening to begin with.

[Nibb]

You will always have a tank, and therefore always have the tank limit break.
You will always have a healer, and therefore always have the healer limit break.
You won't always have anything other than BRDs in your group though, so you won't always have the DPS limit break.

Excuses like "but what if both healers are dead?!" are shitty arguments, because it means the group messed up badly and is going to wipe anyways, or is just plain bad to begin with. Don't try to justify BRD having the wrong limit break based on situations that shouldn't be happening to begin with.

So your suggestion is to make BRDs a must have. That isn't going to solve anything.

I think bards getting a TP/MP restoration would fit perfectly with the job. Not too overpowered, and certainly helpful on long fights.

[Reiterpallasch]

So your suggestion is to make BRDs a must have.

Yes, DPS are a must have for any fight anywhere for anything. If you reread what I wrote, it's that a group of 1 tank, 1 healer and 2 bards have exactly 0 dps limit breaks.

People saying that bard shouldn't have a DPS limit break because they do a lot of damage is like saying a healer shouldn't have a healer limit break because they do a lot of healing. How in the actual fuck does any of that make sense?