So this compensation

[Yuufarlc]

World of Warcrafts Launch was as/more disasterous then this, they compensated players with 48 hours free play, sadly enough that didnt bury WoW.

http://au.gamespot.com/news/world-of-warcraft-wracked-by-problems-6116566

[Malix]

World of Warcrafts Launch was as/more disasterous then this, they compensated players with 48 hours free play, sadly enough that didnt bury WoW.

http://au.gamespot.com/news/world-of...oblems-6116566

sooo... let me get this straight.. you are comparing a game that launched in 2004 to one that relaunched in 2013 when technology and networking has advanced leaps and bounds ahead of 2004? Seems legit...

[urieaal]

World of Warcrafts Launch was as/more disasterous then this, they compensated players with 48 hours free play, sadly enough that didnt bury WoW.

http://au.gamespot.com/news/world-of...oblems-6116566

not really, you were able to log into the servers and while ya at one point i know dalaran early early during release had crashed for a few days they reimbursed us both with play time missed while servers where down and rested experience. SE is only contemplating reimbursing 7 days of play time, as well servers are locked to new players, since about 5 or 6 days ago? the servers may well have just crashed instead of whats going on atm. this is ongoing to and not for seen to be much more then a simple bandaid fix since there adding some new clusters to the servers in place rather then add more servers atm.

its a problem that could have been easily for seen. and prepared for. it wont matter at the end of the month though. they wont need more servers because people will have just given up.

plus when the servers were up they always had queues not 1017. also it wasn't all your country's servers you could log into a rp or pvp server and play more often then not.