
Originally Posted by
Ramesses
I keep asking... who IS this guy???
No matter what settings you play with, he has no shadows. You can safely bet that he's Ascian (Greek for "without shadow"; a+skia), and was thus the source both of Y'shtola's claims that she's in town to find Emerick's "shadowless associate" as well as the knowledge that the Ascians also seek the key she's after.
Many people know it means without shadow, but not many people know that this is only its literal definition. The Shadowless was a real-world term used for a specific people - those from the tropical/equatorial Latitudes. If this ties into their lore at all... that I don't know.
Based on the way a starshower signals his arrival as a bad omen (though the scene looks kind of like he rode in on it), I'd say he, or another ascian who at least mentions him, will be turning up again. Probably with that army in hand, yeah?

Originally Posted by
Catapult
The final confrontation with a double echo... supposedly, Y'shtola has agreed to a private meeting with Stahlmann there. Why? I know the broad reason, but I want you to spell it out in detail for me.
I wanted to approach this question in a way that somehow tied it back to discerning whether she's just got good mage powers or is using Archon abilities, or whether she was in town for the whole 2 weeks to four months, or anything that could help us narrow her down - but I've got nothing.
Thing is, I can't think of any reason she wouldn't prefer to deal with Sthalmann via a private meeting. No matter how you spin it, she'd essentially need the heaviest hitters in Limsa to even get credible jurisdiction, and then even if she were able to pull that off, it she'd need to provide motive, which would essentially require her to say,
"And it was all to get his hands on that immensely powerful artifact capable of making him nigh on invincible to you. Now, take it from him and give it to me ... because that's why I came he- I don't care if we just me- WILL YOU JUST GIVE ME THE DAMN HORN?"
A private meeting was her only chance to quietly secure the artifact for the Circle of Knowing (or "Sharlayan Council") and get the hell out of dodge without the Ascians getting the key or picking up her trail. Load of good it did her, but still, that was probably what she had in mind.
I wish I could connect this to evidence that she's more likely to be using Conjurer abilities or Archon Superpowers... whether she's reguar ol' teleporting or Archon Time Traveling ... but no dice.
Again, the only thing stopping me from Loremongering this is that, as much as I love writing theories, I will not call them facts just because I think they're likely considering the facts as I contextualize them.

Originally Posted by
Orophin
Now this isn't going to amount to a hill of beans, but after this Niublaet goes on he paused through his little diatribe as Hyllfyr gives him a cold stare of death WITH ONE EYE.
We only see one eye. The camera only zooms-in on one eye. The other eye could very well be just fine off screen. We don't know. What we do know is that, even though the lighting is different, the character model art packet used in this scene is the exact same one used to render Shot Through the Heart, down to the same axe and same red iris color that Sthalmann doesn't have, but would sure be distinctive.

Originally Posted by
Mjollnir
Thanks, that's filled the only hole I could find in my theory. Only one so extremely familiar with the minutae of the lore could possibly hope to recall where to look for all of that evidence!
It's quite possible that this "Moose" figure just has a lot of text files and a Windows search button to help him out.

Originally Posted by
Mjollnir
Baderon's comment (not Hob btw)
Point Mjollir - don't write 5 page posts after midnight!

Originally Posted by
Mjollnir
infers the crew of the Astilicia drove it back. As the Astalicia is the ship in Shapeless Melody, it's this event he's referring to.
Devil's Advocate - why would the Astalicia be out without their Captain? The nametag in '62 clearly says Sthalmann. I'm still not ready to buy that it's the Astalicia. I pointed out that they looked the same, but so might countless other pirate ships.
For all we know, ten years ago, Sthalmann was first mate of Pirate Captain Hob. I don't think we have much history on the guy, and he owes Baderon enough favors to have been a citizen for some time... and we still don't know why in one quest his ship has a common room identical to the Astalicia and then all of a sudden he's using a ferry from the FSH guild.

Originally Posted by
Mjollnir
The Barracudas arrive when the Sahagin attack and drive off the Sea Serpent by tossing the Tablet. I think he's telling the truth, as we don't see the tablet again. He implores Y'shtola to teach him how to use the horn; I am presuming he knows she has read the tablet after speaking to the cat in customs.
I agree with the second part of that to such a degree that I now think it's even less likely that he truly tossed the tablet as opposed to keeping it hidden to himself. If he knew the cat read it, he knows it can be read - why risk tossing it before he's sure whether or not he can convince Y'shtola to spill the dirt?

Originally Posted by
Mjollnir
Killed the Admiral in a failed coup? How dare you suggest such a thing? Unless you have any evidence of course? The only thing I can find pertaining to '62s Admiral's death is from Never the Twain Shall Meet:
The Sahagin only know where the Admiral would be due to the possession of his sailing charts, which were provided to them through Travanchet, who got them from Emerick, who was told to do so directly by Sthalmann. He orchestrated the whole thing - that's how he knows the deed's been done before anyone else.
Why would the Admiral himself be on the Seal Rock Provisional Unit, wouldn't it be more likely that he was intercepted independently due to the same sailing charts?

Originally Posted by
Mjollnir
that's not a nickname, it's a description.
Neither of us can claim either is conclusive at this time. Sthalmann could have just been avoiding flat out saying that the Astalicia was Hyllfyr's due to the political implications. He plays his hand close to the vest.

Originally Posted by
Mjollnir
The other pirate groups acknowledge his authority and he's ordered a ship to be built (which takes a while!).
If the position in the 'Cudas comes from winning a Trident, and the Trident is basically pirate on pirate, is the winner not respected? Merlwyb was able to win Hyllfyr's respect in exactly this manner once she kicked some ass a little closer to home.
The ship Sthalmann requested sank because it was hastily built. He rushed it and didn't pay properly and it sank. To me this implies a time crunch.

Originally Posted by
Mjollnir
No-one mentions that the Admiral is new or that there's been any recent change to the status quo in '62. In '72 when Merlwyb takes the chair, it's all anyone's talking about.
1562

Originally Posted by
Baderon
There's a war goin' on 'twixt rival factions: Rhoswen and 'er Sanguine Sirens against Carvallain and 'is Kraken's Arms...with each an' every one of 'em lookin' to dispose of Limsa's new Admiral an' take the spot for 'emselves. Problem is, they're too busy rippin' out each other's gizzards to get 'round to doin' the chief 'imself.
I think from here on out it's mostly just theory-on-theory. I simply can't buy into yours yet because it assumes that without any wiggle room that because Sthalmann has one eye, he is without a doubt one-eyed Hyllfyr, whose reputation under his current guise was gained in 10 years, and everything else can be written off as part of this conspiracy.
I'm not saying you're wrong, just that in the past, I've made many of the same assumptions you're making and they didn't pan out for me on the whole. You've fixed the problems that made my similar theories collapse by turning Sthalmann into Hyllfyr, which I'm not saying is 100% Guaranteed wrong, but is built with the same kind of hierarchical logic they use on Ancient Aliens whereby if the first simple assumption is wrong, the bigger picture is erased.
"This ancient Egyptian 3cm wooden artifact looks like an airplane. If we blow it up 50x, it flies, therefore the Egyptians knew about aeronautics. How could they power their giant planes (which we assume they had because they had a 3cm wooden toy)? Well, the Pyramid could be used to make a chemical reaction (that we have no evidence that it was) to power the planes (that we didn't find) and we see in India that their (fictional) planes flew using a gyroscopic mercury vortex (that phsyicists have disproven). This could have been used to fly the glider (we have no evidence of) Therefore, it is far less likely that we misunderstood this single 3cm artifact and far more likely that aliens developed trans-dimensional intergalactic wormhole technology to come to Earth and build the easiest structure to build out of hardened dirt. And then they left."
All we have to do is prove that Sthalmann isn't Hyllfyr. Not even that Hyllfyr in '72 didn't exist in '62, just that Sthalmann isn't Hyllfyr, and the whole house of cards comes down. I can't make that leap. I can't even make the leap in my own theory.
I'm just trying to find what options have the highest statistical probability. Unfortunately, it requires that I take the 2nd or 3rd most likely on smaller issues just to make the 1st most likely on the bigger ones fit.
As much as I hate to be like, FERN! FERN! ATTENTION! FERN? FERN! FEEEERN! I think he might be needed someday for some of these vague introduction storylines, at the very least to drop some confirmation clues, considering negating clues will just make us jump to new excuses! lol I thought some spaghetti-unraveling would lead to some answers, but all we've managed to do is identify the location of the knots.