Quote Originally Posted by Elexia View Post
This is how most international games (games with home developers in a different nation but support numerous) work actually..so that actually isn't anything weird to have happen.

Besides, if there were no value to the 1.0 players they wouldn't have introduced the legacy membership. So once again it's less about entitlement and more about the skewed process that seemed to have occurred since getting inactive people and basically using it as an advertisement tool during closed alpha isn't exactly wise, which is why outside of the people excited to see it different from 1.0, a lot of other people see it as SE's desperate attempt to make it like an MMO from 2004-2007 era so having them for a very limited alpha does nothing when their feedback consists mainly of "lack of content" xD.
You are such a failure at trashtalking ...been a legacy member entitles you to pay only 9.99$ ,a unique chocobo mount design,your name in the credits,a mark to show you survived the war. But not alpha access...
and if there is a lack of content why is SE having such a hard time making space for new people to join the alpha? and most testers are applauding the team claiming the Alpha build has the quality of Beta.
I seriously don't know whats your problem with what SE is doing but you are just making yourself look like a fool