Quote Originally Posted by Twiddle View Post
All i know is we are currently arguing for the sake of arguing. This subject in general is very touchy, and some of you guys are down playing it to sound as if the solutions is as easy as a yes or no poll. Well it's not. Depending on how SE approaches this, the repercussions can be major. As such am looping back to an earlier post of mine, that SE as of right now have taken the perfect position, the aspect that few if any will object to, is confirmed. And keeping the other one up in the air with no anchors in the ground.
I think you fail to realize that SE simply going on ahead and adding non-SS marriage, while choosing not to implement SS marriage, IS TAKING A SIDE. Your failure to realize that also shows your bias in this argument, but to each his/her own. It's hardly a perfect position as it goes against what a large population of players would prefer. If they wanted to avoid taking a stance on the issue, they could just do away with marriages in-game completely as it is merely a novelty of immersion and unnecessary. If SE finds it so touchy, then why even implement? How does it make sense to say "since this is a very touchy subject and since we don't want to upset the masses, we are just going to go with 'View A' for now... 'View B' may be reconsidered later.." LOL. SE just told everyone their stance, like it or not. I agree with you in that I think SE will do exactly what they said they would do, implement non-SS marriage and leave the idea of SS marriage floating in the wind until the buzz dies down. A tactic used by alot of people who'd share that stance.