Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9
Results 81 to 85 of 85
  1. #81
    Player
    ChiefCurrahee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    959
    Character
    Chief Currahee
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 60
    (0)

  2. #82
    Player
    indira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,376
    Character
    Indira Cliodhna
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Valmonte View Post
    Intel has stolen and used more of AMD's successful cache techniques than i can count. the last Intel "clone" was the am 5x86. AMD had stomped intel for years until intels big break in 02.
    thats your opinion not a fact. only the first athlon was better it had twice the speed of the Pentium 3.
    but in the end AMD is still garabge.
    (1)

  3. #83
    Player
    Huginn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    301
    Character
    Huginn Aesir
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 50
    AMD gamers would not want to use this type of processor. this is for economical builds that will still actually funtion properly (unlike intel's atom processor)
    stay away from this if you want to play FFXIV, go with an AM3 and a real video card from nVidia or ATI/AMD
    (1)

  4. #84
    Player
    Huginn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    301
    Character
    Huginn Aesir
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by indira View Post
    thats your opinion not a fact. only the first athlon was better it had twice the speed of the Pentium 3.
    but in the end AMD is still garabge.
    who who WHOA! where did that come from? AMD has been leading the processor market for longer than intel has been around. intel only barely pushed cirrus logic out of the market.
    amd being garbage is indeed your OPINION and in no way fact. AMD was beating the heck out of intel for decades, especially with their instruction sets. it was not until the core xy processors that intel edged over AMD. in FACT, AMD had to label their processors with a numbering scheme that had nothing to do with the speed of the processor in order to compete with intel's underperforming processors. an AMD 3200+ ran at 2000MHz, but OUTPERFORMED an intel that ran at 3200MHz. people complained that AMD was "deceiving them" with the labeling scheme, but really, intel was scamming people by pretending their processors could hold a candle to AMD. additionally, cost to performance, AMD wins hands down.

    have fun with your i7 processor that costs you 12x what my PhenomII x4 cost me. I can still run FFXI, FFXIV, a full screen and windowed video while ripping music and secure erasing my PCIe SSD and still only use 85% of the processor. i would upgrade to an 8 core AMD, but im already not using all of my 4 core.
    (1)

  5. #85
    Player
    Pseudopsia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    1,078
    Character
    Kare Ruhts
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 57
    Quote Originally Posted by PSxpert2011 View Post
    To all you Gaming-PC builders, tell me what you think about "AMD structure".

    http://promotions.newegg.com/AMD/12-...MECH-_-AMD-E3A

    Could this be a solution to economize PC design around sophisticated MMOs.
    (Please read, watch the video and listen before giving a opinion)

    You are probably trolling, but anyways I'll bite.

    Your title should be renamed to " New Processing CHIP for extremely bad gaming, however not as bad as Intel IGP."

    If you want to play WoW or other old games you can get away with IGP, however current FFXIV needs a real video card. Maybe not 2.0.

    Trinity is good for really cheap multimedia PCs.

    I was still curious how bad the performance is so I went searching for some benchmarks and found some.
    http://www.oc.com.tw/article/1209/re...le.asp?id=7353
    (1)

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9