Results 1 to 10 of 22

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    PyurBlue's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    732
    Character
    Saphir Amariyo
    World
    Brynhildr
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 40
    Quote Originally Posted by Avoidy View Post
    You already alluded to this in parentheses, but it would completely invalidate the point of the roulette if they did this.
    It won't. How many times have you checked your roulette party, seen that everyone is 90+ yet still gets Sastasha? In that case, forcing a higher level dungeon doesn't impact people queuing directly at all. The lowest impact way of making this work is to check the party and see if it would make sense to apply the limited roulette restriction or not.

    Though even in the more general case it's not a given that restricting roulette choice would have negative consequences. For that to happen everyone would need to avoid the same dungeons/trials/whatever. Not just some people, but the majority of the people using roulette. It's not clear if that would actually happen. That roulettes are used to fill duties shouldn't be an excuse to exclude them from improvements.
    (2)

  2. #2
    Player
    PorxiesRCute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    349
    Character
    Nekhii Qestir
    World
    Kraken
    Main Class
    Botanist Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by PyurBlue View Post
    It won't. How many times have you checked your roulette party, seen that everyone is 90+ yet still gets Sastasha? In that case, forcing a higher level dungeon doesn't impact people queuing directly at all. The lowest impact way of making this work is to check the party and see if it would make sense to apply the limited roulette restriction or not.
    This is a good point. Maybe an alternative where you could check "limited leveling roulette" when queueing by yourself, and if everyone picked it, then it would go by the lowest level of whoever was in the matched party.
    (0)