Results 1 to 8 of 8

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Hallarem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Posts
    1,173
    Character
    Hallarem Aurealis
    World
    Omega
    Main Class
    Dragoon Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by MikkoAkure View Post
    Unless EE4, a random sidequest, or a surprise comment from Koji, Kate, Oda, Ishikawa etc. comes out and mentions it directly, we just don’t know.

    Like I mentioned in the other Miqo’te thread here a couple of days ago, Mystel on the First are in the same situation as Tural’s Hhetsarro. But the G tribe has the same customs as Eorzean Sun Seekers despite being based in Ilsabard, so it’s not isolated to Eorzea.
    Two threads worth within a couple of days lol. Didn't expect a resurrection so quickly. Waiting on the third Miqo'te population thread after a few days. But jokes aside.
    The main continent Miqo'te very much have the same culture, since they spread from the same areas and part of history.

    G'raha is from Corvos, on the other side of the strait from Radz-at-han. And Y'shtola commented on G'raha being able to challenge for Nunh if he wanted to. So the culture is very much the same in all of the main continent. Aside from naming conventions among Imperial Citizen Miqo'te of "Potitus" as their last name, which oddly enough means "Captured, obtained, controlled" in latin. And the Field Record of Dyunbu Pyr Potitus an Imperial Miqo'te doesn't really give a vibe of it being a forced name either. "See the path she walked which led to her adopting the surname Potitus, common among Miqo'te with imperial citizenship". So it's just the devs weirding it out.

    I don't mind cultural differences, those make sense if there is enough distance, people adapt to their surroundings and absorb the nations culture they live in. The main oddity still is the birth-rate being wonky.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    MikkoAkure's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    2,212
    Character
    Midi Ajihri
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Hallarem View Post
    Aside from naming conventions among Imperial Citizen Miqo'te of "Potitus" as their last name, which oddly enough means "Captured, obtained, controlled" in latin. And the Field Record of Dyunbu Pyr Potitus an Imperial Miqo'te doesn't really give a vibe of it being a forced name either. "See the path she walked which led to her adopting the surname Potitus, common among Miqo'te with imperial citizenship".
    Considering what Potitus means, Rhitatyn's surname Arvina being "fat" in Latin, and who the Garleans were as people, I don't think it's exactly voluntary that the Miqo'te came up with on their own. It's probably something they have to take if they get citizenship, which is something probably more difficult for them due to being races likely prejudiced against if those names are anything to go by. It's probably also a mark of having abandoned their original culture for the Garleans'.


    OP was theorizing that Eorzea's aether could be behind Miqo'te's gender distribution, but yeah, with the G tribe living in Ilsabard but having the same customs as Eorzean Miqo'te, that sort of sinks that theory. A few questions I do have are that the "26 tribes" thing was supposed to be the Miqo'te tribes who went back to Eorzea during the 5th Umbral Calamity, but why are there G tribe members in Ilsabard who claim heritage going back to the Third Astral Era and never having left? And how does that explain G tribe NPCs who are in Eorzea? And what is the whole deal with the Moon Keepers - where did they come from originally?

    Ignore the wiki on this one, I already had that discussion with someone else recently where the wiki makes up stuff about the Miqo'te again.
    (0)

  3. #3
    Player
    At0msk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2024
    Posts
    11
    Character
    P'majha Azab
    World
    Omega
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 100
    I've often wondered about the Keepers, were they always like that with their traits or are their differences a result of being under the canopy of the Black Shroud. Perhaps the Ilsabard Miqo'te were the Seekers and the Meracydian Miqo'te are the Keepers? We just don't know as of yet, but I'd like to find out one day - Keeper lore especially is extreme sparse compared to the Seekers currently.
    (2)

  4. #4
    Player
    Iscah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,107
    Character
    Aurelie Moonsong
    World
    Bismarck
    Main Class
    Summoner Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by MikkoAkure View Post
    A few questions I do have are that the "26 tribes" thing was supposed to be the Miqo'te tribes who went back to Eorzea during the 5th Umbral Calamity, but why are there G tribe members in Ilsabard who claim heritage going back to the Third Astral Era and never having left? And how does that explain G tribe NPCs who are in Eorzea? And what is the whole deal with the Moon Keepers - where did they come from originally?
    I noticed the same oddity when I was compiling my list of info on the Seeker tribes.

    My best attempt at inventing a scenario to explain both facts being true – that the 26 tribes only took their Eorzean letter-prefixes upon arriving there but the G tribe got a letter despite staying behind:

    1. Seeker tribal customs are already more or less in place by the time of the fall of Allag.

    2. Migration happens; a 27th "Corvos tribe" stays behind.

    3. A tia from the Eorzean G tribe goes adventuring and ends up claiming the Corvos tribe; since they have no letter he declares this to now be part of the G tribe. Alternately the whole tribe struggles to find a place in Eorzea and end up turning back and merging with the Corvos tribe.


    Keepers could potentially be a completely separate initial migration from where the Miqo'te originally came from, or perhaps they're part of the same group that migrated to Eorzea the first time before the Allagans captured part of the population and took them to Ilsabard. (No canon support for any of this, though.)


    Another thing that occurs to me is, perhaps the Allagans could have caused the gender imbalance – but not in the genetic-engineering way people like to propose. If – hypothetically – they were capturing a lot of the population and for whatever reason placed higher value on the men, or were assigning them more dangerous tasks or isolated tasks (army conscripts for example) then you end up with an artificial imbalance of genders and their culture reinforces that. (In this scenario perhaps the culture came about wholly in response to the imbalance, or perhaps the nunh was more of a chieftain role originally and the harem part only came about once there was an absence of other men per tribe. Likewise it could have been what drove Keeper men to stay away from their communities. Have it last long enough and maybe they start to forget what they did before.)


    But this is all very hypothetical and not supported by canon lore.
    (0)