

What IS your take? Paying $15/mo sub for something you don't use is convenient? Huh??? Who is this convenient for?Who am I blaming for my decisions?
The point I was making is that unsubbing, having the game improve, and chasing a new house would be inconvenient, whereas paying a $15/mo sub for something I don't use much is not. My mental health is just fine, but thanks for your concern.
The broader issue is whether SE using false scarcity is a cynical business practice that keeps funds coming in despite little content being added.


Compared to the inconvenience of spending months (or years) bidding on houses in case you do come back in a few months or hell even in a year or two, yeah, it's more worth it to keep shelling the money for it than the absolute waste of time of months of bidding with constant losses if you care even a tiny tiny bit about housing.


We'll have to agree to disagree on keeping an in-game house for a game you haven't touched in months-years as being convenient, I guess.Compared to the inconvenience of spending months (or years) bidding on houses in case you do come back in a few months or hell even in a year or two, yeah, it's more worth it to keep shelling the money for it than the absolute waste of time of months of bidding with constant losses if you care even a tiny tiny bit about housing.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

