Results 1 to 10 of 44

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Carighan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    1,658
    Character
    Carighan Maconar
    World
    Zodiark
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Lorika View Post
    I never liked EW RNG on the card.Astrodyne was crap and the RNG on symbol for getting the maxbonus even more.
    But i admit i was skeptical about the AST rework at first.... Now i really like it and i have ton of fun with it.
    Thinking about this, I would put my thoughts on current Astro cards like this?

    * I like the idea behind randomization affecting the cards.
    * Every single implementation of it so far has been disappointing, lame, laughable or ridiculous.
    * Hence, the current non-random system is by far the best version yet, even if on paper I dislike it. Unlike all the other attempts, this one actually works, so it wins by default.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    IDontPetLalas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Posts
    1,419
    Character
    Alinne Seamont
    World
    Goblin
    Main Class
    Astrologian Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Carighan View Post
    Thinking about this, I would put my thoughts on current Astro cards like this?

    * I like the idea behind randomization affecting the cards.
    * Every single implementation of it so far has been disappointing, lame, laughable or ridiculous.
    * Hence, the current non-random system is by far the best version yet, even if on paper I dislike it. Unlike all the other attempts, this one actually works, so it wins by default.
    I would prefer at least 2 of the prior versions of AST to this version. What would you see as being "lame, laughable or ridiculous" in the prior versions, considering that they were functional as well. I'm not ignoring that SE had to put in a hotfix on at least one occasion.

    So I would definitely prefer Stormblood, or Shadowbringers. You're really saying that DT wins out over these because they fall into one or more of the "disappointing, lame, laughable or ridiculous categories?
    (1)

  3. #3
    Player
    Lorika's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2024
    Posts
    385
    Character
    Kaeline Artelus
    World
    Phantom
    Main Class
    Gunbreaker Lv 74
    Quote Originally Posted by IDontPetLalas View Post
    I would prefer at least 2 of the prior versions of AST to this version. What would you see as being "lame, laughable or ridiculous" in the prior versions, considering that they were functional as well. I'm not ignoring that SE had to put in a hotfix on at least one occasion.

    So I would definitely prefer Stormblood, or Shadowbringers. You're really saying that DT wins out over these because they fall into one or more of the "disappointing, lame, laughable or ridiculous categories?
    No RNG = win by default.
    Now, i would prefer a mix of the new version with some old version.

    Drawing only one card but with no RNG and giving the buff to the entire party.
    I don't know how to explain it in english.... but i will try.

    Just keep the actual cards with the two different set, but drawing only one of the card (putting all the others on CD) and when you play it, it buff all the party.
    When the 3 cards of the current set are played, you can switch to the next set.
    (0)

  4. #4
    Player
    Carighan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    1,658
    Character
    Carighan Maconar
    World
    Zodiark
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by IDontPetLalas View Post
    So I would definitely prefer Stormblood, or Shadowbringers. You're really saying that DT wins out over these because they fall into one or more of the "disappointing, lame, laughable or ridiculous categories?
    Stormblood was just fishing for damage cards. There was no interactivity with it, if you wanted to be optimal, you either successfully fished for damage cards, or you got a better-luck-next-time ticket.

    Shadowbringers was the same but in much less impactful (since you always got 3 damage cards, the only randomized loss of potential was on yourself) and hence even more annoying since the effect even of a bad draw was downright trivial given how low healer DPS was even back in ShB (compared to now in DT I mean).

    Basically why I mind both of these systems: Only DPS matters. I enjoy randomness in some regards, but not if it's between a "win" and a "lose" in a slow-cycling situation. If I automatically got a card every second GCD and each was a 50/50 between a damage card and a dud card, it wouldn't matter. If I got a damage card each time and a random utility card, then sure, that's fantastic in fact. It's also remarkably close in most functional regards to what we have now, which hints at why I think the current system works so well.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sylvain View Post
    Assuming no change in drawing options, it would mean that the draw of Arrow/Bole would result in a 50% chance for you to get a DPS cards, which means undesirable outcome half the time.
    If we were to chance the system to a 2 buttons, so one drawing Balance/Arrow/Spear and the other Bole/Ewer/Spire then we're kind of back to where we started but actually worse.
    You get the same about of damaging cards and your utility also became RNG thus unreliable and useless.
    Agreed. If those are random draws between damage and utility that's just a win-vs-dud setup again. Even if we had Redraw, that just means 75% win vs 25% dud. Same underlying problem though. And if it's the second option then like you say, it's like a strictly inferior version of what we have now.
    (0)

  5. #5
    Player
    Silver-Strider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    1,753
    Character
    Silver Strider
    World
    Famfrit
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Carighan View Post
    Stormblood was just fishing for damage cards. There was no interactivity with it, if you wanted to be optimal, you either successfully fished for damage cards, or you got a better-luck-next-time ticket.
    As opposed to the current system where I hit draw and just disregard 2 out of 3 cards because they're functionally no different to every other oGCD in the toolkit. While I've never liked AST in any of its past incarnations, to say there wasn't any interactivity is just a blatant lie.

    Between Redraw, Minor Arcana and Royal Road giving me ways to adjust my cards, Sleeve Draw to give me a mixed bag, and Time Dilation and CO to extend the duration of my cards (and regens), I had far more interactivity than I currently do, which is 0 now. I draw 4 cards now and that's it. There's no way to enhance the cards in any way, extend their duration, expand their effects to the party, nothing. The new system is probably the worst out of every system thus far because it lacks any interactivity at all, even seals for all their flaws had a goal in mind for their usage. Now, I just toss the 1 DPS card I get a minute on the highest appropriate DPS and the other 2 cards may as well just not even exist since I have other skills that do exactly the same thing they do but better, with the sole exception being Arrow and that's almost entirely because it buffs Addlo for SCH more than anything else of relevance. That 1 interaction between jobs though, is still nothing compared to what AST (and Healers as a whole) have lost.
    (4)
    Last edited by Silver-Strider; 09-27-2024 at 02:22 PM.