Quote Originally Posted by AnjouMaaka View Post
I understand how tank stance works. I wouldn't be a tank main if I didn't. Tank stance simply states that it greatly enhances enmity generation. How tank stance boosts enmity generation isn't part of the equation here because my point is to show that the OP's suggestion is bad and poorly thought out. It fixes healer design at the cost of everyone else's fun. Even with tank stance, it would likely be a whole mess like what we had at the start of this expansion where they buffed tank enmity because even with tank stance, pictomancer's damage was affecting the % of damage done part of that equation too easily. If they have that much trouble getting enmity correct with things as is, you really want them to do what the OP is suggesting? Tanks won't be able to hold aggro at all.
Pictomancers damage wasn’t messed up square just pandered to bad tanks who spent all of endwalker walking up and looking at the trash and getting agro, shockingly when a class has front loaded damage you actually have to group the trash and give them some damage before moving on. That’s not a flaw in angry generation that’s a flaw in people’s ability to tank. If you do half and AOE then run halfway across the map it’s not the Pictomancers fault if they rip agro.

Changing tanks and healer damage would do literally nothing to how ridiculously high tank agro generation is unless you are really really bad at tanking and are too used to EW’s design where you barely even tanked

Ironic coming from the person constantly preaching that tank sustain is the only defence poor tank mains have against the encroaching bad healing dictatorship or something