Please tighten up the housing system

[NegativeS]

Whether or not this person's server has available plots that they hadn't availed themselves of due to preference, I am still a proponent that having such a resource fundamental for several aspects of the game limited to a fraction of the actual playerbase seems silly.

60 plots per ward (including the subdivisions), 30 wards per locale, 5 locales per server, makes 9000 plots per server, and 72,000 per standard logical data center.
288,000 in NA and JP, 144,000 in EU, and 45,000 in OC, makes a grand total of 765,000 houses available in the game as of now.

If each half ward has 20 smalls, 7 mediums, and 3 larges (based on the Goblet, unsure if this is different in other locales as I wasn't bothered to check), then that would make...
510,000 smalls,
178,500 mediums,
and 76,500 larges, across all servers.

For a game that likely has a handful of millions of players playing actively enough to maintain a house, this is unacceptable.

If a person has the aspirations to foster a large FC, or even just flex their creativity or participate in design contests, then it would be a bit silly to expect them to just tolerate a small estate. And yet, mediums and larges are so fought for because of their scarcity, sat on by those with the means to constantly upkeep their sub, even if they don't actually participate in most gameplay anymore. And in some cases, a single person will monopolize several of this extremely limited resource.

I will never not be a supporter of instanced housing. But until that happens, we need so many more restrictions on who can own a plot in a ward, and how many. Letting people grandfather in their monopolization of a ward is the third dumbest thing ever to come out of Square Enix (the second and first probably being XIV 1.0 and the push for NFTs).

[sindriiisgaming]

okay since everybody chose to fixate on the housing situation in my world and even rush to accuse me of bidding on large/med houses you kind of force my hand to reply here.

firstly. lets look at this site that was linked by

https://zhu.codes/paissa?world=56&si...es=2&tenants=4
Seems like there are plenty of houses available on your server.

Phoenix has 309 open plots, at least 0 of which are available for bidding.
287 plots have missing or outdated lottery data if we take this number literally there are 22 houses for sale in all of phoenix. then you did not count or specify, how many are fc plots, how many are fc/ single person and how many are single person. nobody solo is going to waste effort bidding on fc/solo since its not fair contest. so we can count out the fc and fc/solo plots. this leaves us with a much smaller pool. i cannot say for sure how many exactly are there. but its maybe 5? max. which again ties back to what i said that every house is over bidded. even the smalls. if you go to phoenix and check you will see for example. the solo plots available in shirogane is ONE small all the rest are fc or fc/solo.

it saddens me many people choose to fixate on the houses on just my world alone instead of take notice of some of the more concerning points such as houses being sold by fc famers.
I understand everyone wants that "gottem" moment, but this really isnt it, this system effects every single player and it honestly isnt polished enough

snip.

from what i could see this was the only player trying to keep the thread on track

There's literally 2 pages of houses that are for personal, and even more for FC on the paissa website.

What you want is to get your favorite plot, and that's not SE's problem, the housing system is fine, except if you are on Balmung/Mateus and very select worlds, there's more than enough houses.

Just get a house and stop bidding on mediums and larges only, or only on mist 49
They are all available, there's no need the verify. They are on the site because they are available, and even if they arent, they show as "results" or disappear from the site entirely, they dont stay.

no theyre not. go read the site. it even says 287 cant be verified. again please stop with the accusations, i will happily show my bid history if possible to prove its been nothing but smalls.

Ahh, Stormpeaks is back.



How's that "they'll never add blacklist function to housing" working out for you?

i am not stormpeaks, i literally have threads where i have interacted to her before her account got perma banned. have you considered accusing me of being a titanmen alt?

[PassinLay]

it saddens me many people choose to fixate on the houses on just my world alone instead of take notice of some of the more concerning points such as houses being sold by fc famers.

and yes if you just look at houses for sale it seams fine until you look at how many bids even smalls get, then u can see its pretty bad. for example in all of shirogane only 1 small is for sale that is not shared by fc/individual buyer. its just individual buyer. JUST ONE. as for why shiro, because it being in stb would make it harder for new accounts to quickly reach. this problem isnt even confined to shiro either btw.

I understand everyone wants that "gottem" moment, but this really isnt it, this system effects every single player and it honestly isnt polished enough

my guy if there's like 200 FC houses open (or a lot more) like on certain worlds, it doesnt matter if a multiowner takes 10 of them

[NegativeS]

my guy if there's like 200 FC houses open (or a lot more) like on certain worlds, it doesnt matter if a multiowner takes 10 of them

This implies that there are only so many FCs out there who wouldn't want to avail themselves of a house.

And also that there is only one multi-owner. Or that they'd stop at 10, considering a single subscription can foster 40 characters in a single region.

[sindriiisgaming]

my guy if there's like 200 FC houses open (or a lot more) like on certain worlds, it doesnt matter if a multiowner takes 10 of them

why would it not matter my guy? this is taking away from other players who could have used them for fc use please stop encouraging this behaviour. i am starting to this the accusations are just to cover up the need to keep exploiting this system

[PassinLay]

why would it not matter my guy? this is taking away from other players who could have used them for fc use please stop encouraging this behaviour. i am starting to this the accusations are just to cover up the need to keep exploiting this system

Yeah clearly this game is oh so popular there's going to be 200 (or in the cases of certain worlds even multiple thousands, dynamis and materia say hi) new FC's

Just stop lmao just admit you want people to lose what they got fairly and stop pretending.

This implies that there are only so many FCs out there who wouldn't want to avail themselves of a house.

And also that there is only one multi-owner. Or that they'd stop at 10, considering a single subscription can foster 40 characters in a single region.

Isnt a problem on actually populated worlds from what I've seen over the past few years, except some very rare exceptions that have like one person own an entire ward.

Does it suck ? Yeah, but if they got it fairly, so be it.

[sindriiisgaming]

Just stop lmao just admit you want people to lose what they got fairly and stop pretending.

yeaahhahaha this conversation is over lmao. i dont even want to engage with somebody who thinks that selling fc houses is "obtaining them fairly"

[PassinLay]

yeaahhahaha this conversation is over lmao.

Quote the part of the ToS they broke. I'll be waiting.

[sindriiisgaming]

Quote the part of the ToS they broke. I'll be waiting.

for a long time the people selling clears on pf were not breaking the tos. so the players complained, and they changed it. its not a matter of "its ok because its not against the tos" its a matter of, the tos havent been updated to deal with this, but prolly will be one day

[PassinLay]

for a long time the people selling clears on pf were not breaking the tos. so the players complained, and they changed it. its not a matter of "its ok because its not against the tos" its a matter of, the tos havent been updated to deal with this, but prolly will be one day

So you admit it was done fairly and is not agaisnt ToS

Thank you.