I can act dismissive on people that want to turn a role into something it's not. It's been the exact same song with melee dps mains being annoyed when people not playing or maining the job show up and tell them how the role would be better if it looked like something entirely different. This twofold with the fact that it would essentially be asking the people that enjoy the model to eat the crow and either like the changes or leave. So, say with this in mind, is this a bad thing to be dismissive about that kind of push? I'm sorry but the very enjoyment of the game for me right now is being directly threatened by people that for some of them don't even main the role, so excuse me if i'm being a little irritated, to say the least?
You're definitely right, the devs seem to have dropped the ball with casters when they made SMN into a mockery of rphys though. And the worst thing is I suspect they actually do think that the couple of casts they left on the job every minute still justifies calling it a caster. It is indeed true that so far, they seem for example to still consider positionals an integral part of melee DPS, when they don't seem to consider cast times part of caster DPS anymore. Also side note on RDM, if you think that doublecast doesn't make them casters I don't know what to say. o:
I have played since the start of HW. The ARR BRD you describe is literally not a caster in my book. Again, slapping a couple of casts onto Iajutsus doesn't make SAM a caster, and neither does Communio makes RPR a caster. Unless you're actually trying to argue that it does? Having a cast time on 3 songs, knowing on top of it that Mage and Army were not even part of the DPS rotation back then, and that Foe was a raid buff, doesn't make it a caster by any means in my eyes, just a ranged SAM. I'm perfectly happy with this by the way, if I have to repeat myself once more. In fact, people wouldn't have been mad about the cast times in HW if ARR BRD had already been a caster, and yet, they were. And I do remember what ARR BRD was even though I haven't played it.
If you mean that 1.0 BRD or whatever it was at the time should also be considered for precedence... I mean, can it really? Was 1.0 even the same game? The same battle system? The same roles? Not sure about that... Feels like a stretch to me to use it as a justification for anything...
I have actually read a lot of comments on it not being a caster anymore. A LOT.
- Songs: they fixed it for 5.1 when people complained that BRD was not the heavy dps support it used to be anymore, notably complaining about songs not buffing the party anymore. So your problem with it was actually addressed relatively fast (especially for SE).
- Minne was already the single target buff it was in SB. That it didn't change between SB and SHB can therefore not be a reason for suddenly hating the job?
- Warden's has never changed since its inception in HW, so, I'm confused with this as well?
- Palisade, Tactician and Refresh were a blow to the rphys role as a whole, not BRD, but that's indeed one of the things I covered when I mentioned that has been ripped from rphys identity, and it's left it without a clear use in any party those days, especially when combined with the fact that parties are now drowning under raid mitigation as well. I'd understand leaving the role for this very reason yes. It was a big part of it, even though SB had already started to gnaw at it.
- Foe Requiem yeah, same thing but focused on the BRD. The only raid buff even remotely interesting to use with Hypercharge, and they chose to remove those on the 2 jobs literally described as party supports.
But this hardly concerns cast times... It's actually a part of what I've been clamoring to refocus the job upon, even though I know that raid support like the latter point will not happen unless they do serious rollbacks or changes to the whole battle system. But neither cast times on filler spells will happen anyway for similar reasons: BRD would be literally unplayable in its current state with cast times on the filler.
But I'll say it again, adding cast times back to the songs? Totally up for it, would even feel more like singing.
This exactly what I've been trying to say since the very beginning. 100% agree. Refocus on the basics and what made rphys what it was instead of trying to tack it into other roles. Keep what the players like instead of going for crazy wild changes that are already doomed to be divisive. Make it unique.
This is why reading this:
... is literally filling me with dread. It would be even more punishing than PCT.



Reply With Quote




