You pull you tank question.

[Malthir]

So it's just ego.

No, that's not ego, it's a rational response to someone behaving in a hawkish manner.

If the DPS or Healer is genuinely endangering the party by pulling more then can be handled we have a button for that, it's called a vote kick.

You-Pull-You-Tank is never the correct response, the person with a blue icon that's designated as the tank, tanks, not whoever pulled. It's that simple.

Well the novice hall would disagree with you as it teaches tanks to pull, no one else. People are not your servants you don't get to unilaterally decide on the pace, if you want to do that, role tank or healer as they are the roles that set pace.

[ThorneDynasty]

No, that's not ego, it's a rational response to someone behaving in a hawkish manner.

Why is it hawkish?

[Malthir]

Why is it hawkish?

If you have been asked as per the example I gave, to not make the rest of the groups experience worse/harder/painful/unfun pick and adjective, and you intentionally do it anyway, for you own personal benefit at the cost of others, that's hawkish behaviour. Now the rest of hawk and dove plays out the way everyone else says, vote kick the problem person, aka doves eventually chasing out hawks. However I was suggesting tit for tat as a far quicker way of dealing with the problem, it causes no harm to the rest of the group only the person that instigates suffers, they leave on their own or stop behaving in such a way, the party doesn't have to wait as long to be rid of the behaviour.

[ThorneDynasty]

If you have been asked as per the example I gave, to not make the rest of the groups experience worse/harder/painful/unfun pick and adjective, and you intentionally do it anyway, for you own personal benefit at the cost of others, that's hawkish behaviour. Now the rest of hawk and dove plays out the way everyone else says, vote kick the problem person, aka doves eventually chasing out hawks. However I was suggesting tit for tat as a far quicker way of dealing with the problem, it causes no harm to the rest of the group only the person that instigates suffers, they leave on their own or stop behaving in such a way, the party doesn't have to wait as long to be rid of the behaviour.

Okay, what's the personal benefit?

EDIT:
And what's the collective problem, now that I think about it more?