Wow, Wuk Lamat is really single-handedly ruining the DT story...

[Yshnal]

It would not be okay Ish. It would be the lowest rated and worst expansion as it is currently.

In my personal opinion, it's also cringe the way people talk about the character as though she is real. She is not. She is a poorly written character amongst many other poorly written things in DT. Maybe that's what people are trying to say in some of the rants I've seen.

I'm also not calling for anyone to stop talking. I am telling you that devs tend to interpret feedback a certain way and if what they garner from the expansion is "I hate Wuk Lamat" then we just won't see her again. The problem is, the odds you would see her again anyway are 0.005%. You can still continue to hate on a character that is not real, be my guest.

I would also note you're not even being objective. When you say "Wuk Lamat is the most inconsistent." Based on what metric? Every Scion we know acts out of character at some point and even new ones, like Bakool ja ja become unrecognizable once converted from cartoonist evil to good.

You are positing things like "if wuk lamat didn't exist, Krile's story would be well written." That is a contradiction considering this writer wrote this MSQ. They wrote Wuk Lamat. A lot of these arguments are copium.

Okay-ish doesn't mean that it would be good. It could still be the worst expansion so far, but at least it would be better than what we got. Not having the most annoying and worst written (and with the worst VA, if you play in English) character on screen 99% of the time would definitely help in achieving that.

I don't know what makes you think that people are talking about the character as if it was a real person. Criticising her in particular doesn't mean that anyone sees her as a real person, and I don't even know what made you think that way. Maybe some people's jokes about her? Anyway, this has already been explained by other posters.

And you are not calling for anyone to stop talking, but you were saying that their criticism is "whining" and "having real life issues with the game". You're basically disregarding other people's opinions by making stuff up, instead of reading what they are actually saying.

Moreover, yes, she's the most inconsistent on this expansion. Not because of how she acts (she is who she is), but due to her several insane power increases out of the blue that make no sense just for the sake to keep making her the focus of the story (like being able to beat Bakool Ja Ja, or fight as equals with improved Zoraal Ja), up to the point of even forcing her into the last trial over Krile or G'raha, which were also there. The only other character that did anything similar was Zoraal Ja, and it was properly explained why (30 years plus alexandrian tech). And since you mentioned it, even Bakool Ja Ja's original attitude is explained, and he doesn't change all of a sudden and without thinking twice about it (hint: his mother, the only one that apparently gave him some love and didn't treat him like a tool, made him listen to find another path to end with the deaths of their children).

Lastly, nowhere did I say that if Wuk Lamat didn't exist Krile's story would be well written. I said that there would had been more time to properly develop that story, among others, which is one of the things that make the writing of the expansion this bad. I mentioned this even when I said "I'm not saying that that would had guaranteed that the story was good, but that not being there DID make the story worse." It's curious that you, being the one asking others to not criticise Wuk Lamat so much and instead focus on the writing as a whole, missed this. I think that you insist so much on your thought that people criticise the character, that you miss why we're talking about her. This is not just about her being badly written, but about the fact that she being so badly written (which is not limited to her a character, but also to how she's shoehorned everywhere) ended up affecting other parts of the story.