Quote Originally Posted by Cleretic View Post

Wuk Lamat and Koana are a similar-but-different thing; they're characters with very loud and broad initial archetypes that are never really changed or proven wrong, but the characters are proven to be deeper than that.
Yet again I am amazed reading your posts. On one hand you insult others regarding their reading ability, but the passage I just quoted makes it clear for me that you have no experience with writing, and honestly, I now question your experience with reading real literature. I mean, if those characters seem to you deeper somehow (oh, and BTW Vauthry alone is deeper then both of them combined, the bar is that low) you probably haven't really read a lot of good books, have you? And that's OK, except you insist as presenting yourself as some sort of erudite compared to the poor illiterate peasants that disliked the story.