Quote Originally Posted by jumps004 View Post
But to come in here and wash every single point of criticism with that label adds nothing to the discussion, many in here, less than I would have liked but still, have condemned the grift being put on while still voicing a measured opinion against how the character of Wuk Lamat was portrayed or used. You can add to the discussion with the things about the character you feel were done well, when they added to the story for you, do a detailed break down instead of a reactionary mudslinging contest.
When did I do that?

I fear your reading comprehension may be insufficient, as I applied that to a singular argument someone made, not to everyone who disliked Wuk Lamat as a whole. Re-read my post.