You checked my achievements on loadstone, hmmm yes well so you know this isn’t my raiding main, want me to link my main logs sweetie I do plenty of hard content. Regardless why should you disqualify me for your perceived belief I don’t do enough hard content, there is plenty of anti strikers who don’t do hard content but you won’t call them out. If I need to do hard content to say healers are bad why don’t they need to do hard content to say healers are good. You are both saying we are too good and not good enough. There is no consistency. Engage with the actual substance of our arguments not decide whether we are “allowed to have an opinion” based on your assessment of you belief in our skills.
This is the whole problem, I’ve had people log stalk me and call me a casual who needs to do hard content to understand healers, then when I linked my real logs they said I was obviously too good at the game to have an opinion. At no time did they actually engage with the substance of my arguments
So I say again, pick a damn lane, call me a casual, call me a toxic raider I don’t care just engage with the substance of my arguments or quit randomly deciding that an entire group fits your narrow views so you can ignore them
You are totally missing the point, we aren’t saying “we are better than the stupid devs listen to us” we are saying “we have given you mounds of feedback as to our belief in why the healers aren’t engaging enough and have some evidence via lucky’s censuses that the healer role is haemorrhaging players can you please explain your design decisions more clearly and explain why you won’t acknowledge our feedback rather than making dismissive comments like “go play ultimate””