
Originally Posted by
Kazmarek
And you may be right. You may be 100% right. However, I'm not the only one who's been frustrated with this specific issue, I'm not the first (nor, I suspect, the last) to post forum threads on this issue, and I'm certainly not the only reporting it. To us it's a clear ToS violation; to them, it may just be business as usual... Which is where the policies themselves hold the team back. The policy is to tell you that they're investigating, and that's it. They never do a follow up, you never know what happened, and to a degree, that's fine. I personally would be fine not knowing what action was taken, I'm more interested in clearly knowing when action was not taken, which goes back to my suggestion of having them send a message that says "We've determined the actions in question do not violate Terms of Service." I feel like, in the long run, that would actually save them some time. Unfortunately, they don't take that approach, and so I continue to believe them to be completely ineffective.
Also, you've given a reason why I haven't bothered to state the reason here yet. "It was argued this is more a nuisance issue than a spam issue," the qualifier doesn't matter, the point still stands that it's against ToS. GM inaction is not a good enough excuse, they need to be better.