Where does the mentioned feedback actually come from?

[Valence]

They are going to take your feedback and then compare it to metrics and then decide from there. They aren't just going to listen to the feedback without doing any critical analysis.

Let's take Valence here for example. Valence posts nonstop about how homogenization is killing the game and everything is simpler and dumbed down and this is bad for REASONS. Some moderator or some other team member reads this feedback and the 100 other people on this forum who incessantly bring this up in every topic regardless of relevance and hands it off to yoshi p. Yoshi P reads the feedback and then goes hmm, maybe Valence is correct, I should check the numbers. So then Yoshi P would then go and check any number of metrics to see if this feedback is corroborated. Things such as:

1. Subscription count.
2. Players who cite homogenization and dumbing down in their cancellation survey.
3. Per Capita savage clears in each expansion.
4. Per Capita failed instances.
5. In the case of specific job changes like summoner, shifts in the number of players who main that job after major changes.
6. Average player damage floors across expansions. I.e. if the average hw mch only approached 40% of the theoretical best dps while the average EW mch might be at 50% (or potentially the inverse but let's be real here) then that would be a point of consideration.

And any number of other metrics that they could think of. Forum posters could post 10,000 anti-homogenization posts a day but if the sub numbers aren't dropping catastrophically with people pointing this out as the reason why they are leaving, or content clear rates are noticeably higher now than they were prior to all this homogenization and dumbing down, then they aren't going to de-homogenize things if those are the metrics they primarily care about.

Way to completely miss the point.

1) I'm asking where is the feedback they mention and where does it come from, because unless i'm living in a parallel dimension, it doesn't come from those forums where they tell us to give our feedback. So it has to come from somewhere else, or perhaps the JP forums idk. I don't read japanese. I'm sure the feedback they keep mentioning comes from somewhere, but it doesnt come from there.

2) I'm asking for them to address extremely widely accepted core issues that I listed in the OP. It's not just Valence's issues. You'll find them everywhere on the internet, ingame, reddit, streamers, everywhere. Don't tell me the 2min meta is something I invented. Don't tell me healer problems is something I made up. Don't tell me you haven't seen any of those mentioned before.

3) I'm sure they have their reasons, I want to hear their side of the story, especially regarding those points they keep dodging and not addressing at all.

The point of this post was never to whine about how the devs don't listen to muh feedback.