I'd be happy to be introduced to the Feast players you are talking about who I can talk to about this, but I am unsure what threads upon threads you are speaking of. I will not deny the existence, only that you assist me in the threads you are referring to.
Point half-taken. Granted yes, for me it has probably been easier than for other players, but that is not what I meant when I said it wasn't a grind, because to me a "grind" is a pve-like ressource grind with steady but slow output. Feast was not that for me, not because I found it easy but because of the systems it is based on.
That statement of what I said is not correct and if I worded it like this at some point, my bad/fault. Let me clear of what I mean: I acknowledge that win-trading has been an issue in the past and possibly still is, but I did not say "someone's win shouldn't be questioned", I said that a legit player's achievement should not be devalued by proxy of cheaters existing and muddling the pool.
Skepticism cannot be cured by means other than seeing the players in action or having a trusted player reviewing in their place, but I am not fond of the idea of "guilty until proven innocent". Certain key elements like an unusual spike in rating and change in playing behaviour were give-aways that I'd be skeptical about as well, but the mere fact someone reached Top 100 one or more times is not grounds to be skeptical in a vacuum, at very least to me.