Results -9 to 0 of 238

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Player
    Reinhardt_Azureheim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,640
    Character
    Reinhardt Azureheim
    World
    Alpha
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Doozer View Post
    So you're saying that someone's accomplishment is not devalued by other people getting the same rewards despite not playing fairly (or at all)?
    That is exactly what I am saying. I find it ridiculous to think someone's ranking on a leaderboard or general achievement of completing something is supposed to be devalued because some hillbilly mccheatington can't restrain themselves from being a fraud.

    For the same reason I find it stupid to devalue someone's ultimate clears for not being done on content, people using obscene amounts of plugins and clear sellers existing I find it stupid to actively shit on old Feasters because of wintraders and cheaters existing.

    Kind reminder that all I am asking for in place of the items returning is some form of item tooltip mark (item quality, a star in the name, a rank number, a flavourtext) to be applied to the originals. Because frankly, we care enough that we want to be told apart from people who obtained the replica as players who own the original.

    My only gripe with most of you is "how" the new replicas are supposed to be obtained. They should be obtainable with no limitation to item number, but shouldn't exactly be a freebie like moogle tomestones, wolfmarks or trophy crystals - that is my only take on the matter where I am adamant on and will argue for a form of light-weight ranked obtainment method that can be done even at Bronze, just like pre-6.1 Wolfcollars but better and modern.

    This is not to artificially create scarcity but to instead encourage interaction with content in need of it. We argue for similar treatment in Criterion, don't we?

    Beyond that, let everyone have it, I don't care. Glamour be glamour, just let mine stand out in a tooltip or something.
    (3)
    Last edited by Reinhardt_Azureheim; 04-29-2024 at 06:13 PM. Reason: typos