Quote Originally Posted by Razraptre View Post
I realized that the Metian top is the first time I've seen an armor set display non-job weapons. It just further torches the idea that gear restrictions exist for any kind of "job identity".

Not that I'm complaining about the set, but if my Scholar can already have a sheathed sword why is it too much to ask for chainmail or leather?
We have a few instances of those. like the Neo Ishgardian set of striking got a revolver built in:


I also noticed that the Pictomancer artifact set does have a dagger sheathed on the back of the waist. I guess when you run out of paint all you gotta do is go stabbers.

Quote Originally Posted by Siddiax View Post
Good one! Just more evidence that no one should be taken seriously when they claim that "immersion" will be ruined by the removal of glam restrictions. Could come up with 500 more similar examples, but why bother. Just run around any of the major cities and you'll notice that most players are already wearing outfits that don't "fit" their role, job, or armor type.
Another cool experiment to do is grab random pictures of the YoHRa sets and ask a sprout who didn't get to those raids yet what set is what armor class. It's literally impossible without luck.

Quote Originally Posted by Arkdra View Post
Now that they're adding a dedicated glasses slot, mostly unrestricted cross-class glamming is one of my big asks. I'm feeling the itch to switch main jobs for DT but I've got a lot of glams I am very happy with that are maiming specific. Every time I go looking through striking, scouting, or aiming gear, I never find anything I find compelling. I really wish that everything but the AF sets was unrestricted so every time I was thinking about how viper looks cool, I didn't immediately also think, "but scouting gear ugly."
I also hope that slot can have masks too, there's quite a handful of them and I suppose they could fill in a similar niche of 'stuff that goes on top of your face'.