Quote Originally Posted by Raven2014 View Post
The way I see it "ok we accept your petition and will investigate". If everything is true as claimed, then sure I can see us try to stop it (that's a given). But I think people are taking it WAY farther than that by implying we take the "petition" as truth and just gonna go over putting down the other guy without ever listen to the other side's story. Like if you file a lawsuit, it's the duty of the judge to "commit" to take the allegation seriously and investigate. Or do you think it's better if the judge just take a glance and dismiss it? At the same time, accepting a case and open the investigation doesn't mean the judge already sided with the accusers and believe the defendant guilty ... which exactly some people here are doing.



Like, the scions had butted in many conflicts, but how many time had them go in just gun blazing without a care by blind truth? Like ... NEVER? How many we had go into a conflict that despite the common wisdom would dictate who the bad and good guys, we still try to do a thoroughly investigation before actually commit to the final resolution? Like ... almost every single times?". This complain not only is a big stretch, it does not even have a historical precedence. The Scion is many thing, and taking accusation for granted is not one of them.
It's not a trial. It's a contest. One we've already agreed to participate in on her side. It's not like we're gonna get there and be like "your brother is more loved by the people and has a much better tax policy, I think we'll help make him king instead."