Quote Originally Posted by Aravell View Post
There is actually another side to this argument. In casual content, there is a chance that DF will set the party with 2 WHMs. If someone gets a vuln before a big raidwide and neither WHM have Temperance available, who is the one to blame in that scenario?

I think it's good to always have some self-accountability. It's usually better to not pin the blame on others when there were things you could've done to not die.
The alliance queue really needs a modern shakeup, the queues should backfill so you aren’t getting 5 withdraws in a row with 23/24 saying yes then starting again (especially on the rarer raids where it’s really common that if someone withdraws the roulette will then change tact and dump off the players into something else making you wait even longer)

They should also attempt to evenly divide the players they do have, like if you go in and have 2 SCH, 2 AST and 2 WHM you shouldn’t end up in a situation where all three end up in a party with the other one of themselves, the same could be said for one party having 5 melees and the other having 5 dancers