



So now you’ve pivoted from “you are wrong” to “here is my totally subjective reasoning as to why while you aren’t actually wrong you are functionally wrong in my mind”oh yes expedience that is not available till lvl 90 and fey illum blocks 5% of magical damage which sadly around 80% of bosses dont do magic so uh yeah no sage has more migi and ast did better rpds util they gut the cards and whoo hoo a mere 10% increase damage. Big deal if those are the points that you can provide to make sch feel all that yaya for it. at the end of the day all the healers have bad and goods and its not like they are in a spot that any of them have no use.
Sure go ahead, unlike you I don’t have a problem with SGE players existing
I dont have a problem with sch players existing, that is a thought in your head and fyi before you just make it seem like its me, what about this big huge topic post that says *dear sage mains* sounds like a personal attack on all sage players by op.



Why did this thread turn into an argument over whether SCH or SGE is better? OP is making a request to SGE mains to not overwrite their deployed Adlo, it's a simple request and can easily be respected if the SGE player wants to. Does it matter if the content is easy or hard?





And now people have argued off topic for so long that we've forgotten the on-topic discussions from page 1.Why did this thread turn into an argument over whether SCH or SGE is better? OP is making a request to SGE mains to not overwrite their deployed Adlo, it's a simple request and can easily be respected if the SGE player wants to. Does it matter if the content is easy or hard?
It doesn't matter that it's a simple request. It's not a request worth making in casual content because the SCH doesn't actually lose anything by having their shields overwritten unless they are in the habit of massively overhealing during uptime to begin with, whereas the sage who entertains that request does lose mobility GCDs that they could have replenished at no cost during downtime, which in the scheme of casual play is also not a huge loss but it is still more than SCH loses.
Last edited by Rongway; 01-11-2024 at 10:10 AM.
Sorry cant hear you over:
*MAGI TURRENTS GO BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR*



It keeps being brought up that "it doesn't matter in casual content". Well, does that Toxikon matter in casual content? No, it matters as little as the deployed shields. So it's just a matter of whether or not you respect your cohealer enough to not overwrite their stuff, that's all it is.And now people have argued off topic for so long that we've forgotten the on-topic discussions from page 1.
It doesn't matter that it's a simple request. It's not a request worth making in casual content because the SCH doesn't actually lose anything by having their shields overwritten unless they are in the habit of massively overhealing during uptime to begin with, whereas the sage who entertains that request does lose mobility GCDs that they could have replenished at no cost during downtime, which in the scheme of casual play is also not a huge loss but it is still more than SCH loses.




Exactly, nothing matters in casual content (especially on healers), that doesn’t mean things shouldn’t be changed to work better when it is pointed out that there is a problem
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


