You're a Disgrace

[NekoMataMata]

Because the full context isn't needed? They asked what one specific line meant.

Not everything needs to have a hidden meaning.
I swear most of your posts I see you have to finish it with accusing another poster of something.

I didn't.

It's funny that you're doing literally the same thing I was pointing out by clipping the quote and starting an argument over what should be basically a non-issue. It's like you live here on the forums for the sake of being contrarian.

Also, they asked what one specific line meant while removing the context that gave it meaning.

[Ivtrix]

They're a bit extreme and make no sense but are we really just going to ignore the fact that you clipped that out of context?

Full quote:



They're not entirely wrong. Life sucks. There's a bunch of people that validate breaking hard rules where no flexibility should be considered. The facial brand thing is entirely memeable though.

The entire “No flexibility” it’s very highly debatable lol

It’s a silly argument because it sounds silly. Gives the vibe that a modder shot their cat and now they have a death grudge

[Thurmnmurmn]

I didn't. You're just biased against me.

It's funny that you're doing literally the same thing I was pointing out by clipping the quote and starting an argument over what should be basically a non-issue. It's like you live here on the forums for the sake of being contrarian.

Someone asking a question for clarification is what you were "pointing out". You're constantly assuming what people mean.

And yes I did do that. At least I don't deny what I do. I'm calling you out for your stupid pointless passive aggressive comments.

[NekoMataMata]

Someone asking a question for clarification is what you were "pointing out". You're constantly assuming what people mean.

And yes I did do that. At least I don't deny what I do. I'm calling you out for your stupid pointless passive aggressive comments.

What I pointed out was that the answer to that person's question was clipped out of the quote. Like there's a lot they could've responded to considering their idea of facial brands or whatever for being just bad and instead they went for anything besides that.

Anyways, would you like to make any more admissions? You've acknowledged that you look for pointless arguments on the forum. You've acknowledged that you intentionally look for my posts, and you've acknowledged that you're being a hypocrite by making accusations against me for things I haven't really done. Is there anything else to add to the list? Do you feel validated? Do you feel better about yourself?

[Thurmnmurmn]

Sorry on the double post. On mobile and dunno how to edit.

@nekomatamata
The fact you say I'm bias against you supports my point. As far as I'm aware of, I've never interacted with you. What bias do I have against you exactly?

[NekoMataMata]

Sorry on the double post. On mobile and dunno how to edit.

@nekomatamata
The fact you say I'm bias against you supports my point. As far as I'm aware of, I've never interacted with you. What bias do I have against you exactly?

You've quoted me multiple times. You've even admitted right here that you are frequently on the look out for my posts:

Because the full context isn't needed? They asked what one specific line meant.

Not everything needs to have a hidden meaning.
I swear most of your posts I see you have to finish it with accusing another poster of something.

This either means that you're making a generalization/assumption about all of my posts, or that you have followed my posting around and have made that judgement accusation.

[Thurmnmurmn]

You've quoted me multiple times. You've even admitted right here that you are frequently on the look out for my posts:



This either means that you're making a generalization/assumption about all of my posts, or that you have followed my posting around and have made that judgement accusation.

I've noticed 3 posts today in threads I just so happened to be reading where you did the same thing.

When did I admit to being on the lookout for your posts? And never mind that last comment before where you assume everything about me oh so wrong.

If you do nothing but assume the position of someone who is accusing you of assuming. . . I don't even need to finish that sentence.

[Thurmnmurmn]

LMAO I was just re reading the thread and I never even noticed Neko was the one I made the comment about sounding like a Karen and who pooped in their cereal XD

[RitsukoSonoda]

They're a bit extreme and make no sense but are we really just going to ignore the fact that you clipped that out of context?

Full quote:



They're not entirely wrong. Life sucks. There's a bunch of people that validate breaking hard rules where no flexibility should be considered. The facial brand thing is entirely memeable though.

Their reactions honestly just make it look like a more effective method of getting people to follow the ToS than actual bans. They're apparently terrified over the aspect of everyone else in game seeing proof. Sure doing it will just inevitably result in a modder making a mod to hide the brand on your own screen. It said mod wouldn't stop everyone else from seeing it tho and knowing you ran something on your client you shouldn't have.

Let's look at the checklist they got going so far...

Direct attacks and insults.
Attempt at hiding behind the victim card.
Attempting to make gray areas in a black or white situation.
Attempts at placing incorrect meaning to statements in a lame attempt to discredit the poster.

Sorry kiddos. The only thing you've been doing is openly displaying your lack of character on a forum.

[Zolvolt]

If youa've used TOS breaking addons or directly cheated for the Fall Guys event, I hope you get banned. I hope everyone knows it. I hope you are shamed for the rest of your entire life.

a massive amount of ultimate raiders use cheating addons, and mechanic minimaps, overlay icons to tell you to do X, or a robot to announce how to do a mechanic to you. They rarely get caught sadly.