Make healers DPS with four or five healing actions

[ForsakenRoe]

Far as I can tell, she was using an archived version of it, I'm using the modern version's page with the version history.

An archived version of the Job Guide, from SE's site, yes. It only goes back to SB due to that being the first time they actually made said page, though, so for HW or ARR changes we are entirely reliant on either Gamerescape's version history tab, or Consolegameswiki which exceptionally crispy and sluggish to load for some reason. I figured it would be better to get the info directly from the source as it were, rather than risk transcription errors with a 3rd party (eg they might write that a change happened in 5.15, when it technically happened in 5.15c, and I would want that specificity)

Next time you're wrong about something, do you want me to say in your following posts you don't get to speak/it's not right for you to talk because you were wrong about one thing?

So long as it's a situation identical to this one (where I am wrong, get corrected, and then try to continue talking from a position of knowledge on the subject using the updated information, as if I knew the 'real answer' all along), sure go nuts

Funny thing about old Feast, you could actually dive the opposing team and camp their base in 8v8 matches and just never die as a SCH, the balance was ridiculous back then. If I recall correctly, a single WHM can also keep their entire party alive indefinitely in Frontlines.

I used to do it for the GARO event as WHM, infinitely accessible Repose was absolutely disgusting too. Infinitely accessible Stella on AST as well, for HW specifically. Was especially nasty in frontlines, you hit one guy at a time and watch your blob of attack dogs just pile onto the 'straggler who fell behind'

[Renathras]

So long as it's...

No. One error was...

Okay, yeah, we're done here.

This is the part where the conversation turns from "We're having a good conversation" (you can tell because no posts are getting more than 1 or 2 likes) to "We're bashing Ren now" (where the likes go up above half a dozen - as I always say, just bash Ren and you get likes, proving that the like feature is useless for judging worthwhile posts since actual good conversation posts get few or no likes).

It as a good talk, glad we had it until you and Roe decided to switch into bash Ren mode.

Looking forward to the next time we can have a good conversation.

[ForsakenRoe]

IDK what was meant here either, the reason I said what I said here:

So long as it's a situation identical to this one (where I am wrong, get corrected, and then try to continue talking from a position of knowledge on the subject using the updated information, as if I knew the 'real answer' all along), sure go nuts

Is because I'm fine with getting told 'you don't get to speak because you got something wrong', as long as the situation where it happens, is identical to the one that happened here. I'm just, not giving carte blanche to just say 'oh Roe said something again, everyone discard what was said, because she was wrong about something a few months ago', because that would be silly. Or I could, but the same would apply to everyone, now that'd be funny

I'm also not sure what 'good conversation' was happening, other than us being told that we remembered things wrong (despite me not going from just memory, but also archived copies of the job guides). I also am quite stringent with liking posts, and 'haha dogpile on one guy on forum' is not one of the reasons I go by. Mostly 'I resoundingly agree with the point re: game design that this user has just made' is what does it