^

1) how long are you going to milk that one time we disagreed on the wider interpretation of how someone else said something, I’m not going back to the “I didn’t say the sky wasn’t blue I said the sky was green” with you because as you apparently still haven’t figured out I don’t like bringing baggage from old conversations into new ones, something that you apparently adore doing, is it not strange that everyone you seem to have a problem with gets along fine with with other and with others but not you, take the poster above who disagreed with me but didn’t do it rudely and I answered them, I also don’t agree with your supposed shortlist of enemies half the time, I think shur’s idea of making holy single target relevant is bad, I don’t really love how most of the healer forum likes AST’s burst heavy APM that punishes controllers, Reiner would rather deep dungeons be deleted than ever see another one which I disagree with. Yet somehow the problem always comes back to you, and I’m not the only one who pretty much only has posting problems with you, am I partially the problem, probably, I speak overly verbose and consider hyperbole just a form of expression which is something that grates you but I’m not the only one who seems to only have problems with you

2) besides that argument you made in the above in response to Sebazy (which I actually think is a good idea that is a good evolution of SMN, I just don’t think they will do it) your arguments have consisted of
A) the new primals
B) using actual aspected ruin 3 in the primal phase
I’ve explained how I don’t see either of those as meaningful changes and also explained if you do see them as meaningful changes then more power to you (no matter how many times you bring up my original quote about SMN being at a dead end this doesn’t change), posts 3, 4 and 5 were arguments about how I worded my own argument

3) this is the crux of it, if you truly believe we agree in all but the way we phrase it then why are you still arguing with me, have you noticed 9 arguments out of 10 with me end with you saying “we agree more than I thought I just hate the way you phrase things” more or less. You know you hate the way I phrase things and you know I hate you argue with the way I phrase things rather than arguing my point, if you disagree with my semantics ignore them, I never critique the way you write (only the length it takes you to reach a point)