Quote Originally Posted by LilimoLimomo View Post
This is not at all what I mean, though. I take full responsibility for communicating my ideas poorly in my initial post. I rewrote the entire thing nearly from scratch today with the intent of correcting misunderstandings like this. I hope you'll give it a read if you have the chance!
You only listed benefits, not drawbacks to each.

Testing the queuing is going to take a lot more effort than just timing a macro (as you need to be able to time when you are able to use the next action compared to when you queue it up), however, it is likely to be a time based thing as opposed to a frame based thing.

I also still do not get why you are trying to push this? Yes, they help people who might have a hard time, however, it needs to be stated that you do lose out on the flexibility afforded by the actions as opposed to having them macro'd.

I've said it once and I will say it again. you have been promoting this the wrong way. You should never promote this unless someone has a genuine need for it.

Also, you comment about macros being 'work' and people don't want to put in the time and effort is disingenuous. If macros were deemed effective, all someone would have to do is copy and paste one, or someone would make a website that can do it for you (similar to crafting websites that can automate crafting recipes), so there wouldn't be any extra work as the site would be widely known.