Quote Originally Posted by Shurrikhan View Post
It matches its...
No, it doesn't. Again, you're trying to use the politician definition of "cut spending", which isn't what any non-politician would accept as a definition for "cut". But I'm not going to fight with you over a semantic argument since you're damned and determined to use that word come hell or high water, even if it doesn't mean what you want it to mean, since you think it's somehow a win for you to do so.

Quote Originally Posted by Shurrikhan View Post
Your sub-dividing those groups...
I'm not, though. I'm saying what the groups actually are. Something that's entirely relevant and which your argument requires not to exist.

Quote Originally Posted by Shurrikhan View Post
does not change the simple fact that you can support all those desires within...
It's funny to me that people say I make long posts wasting words, but then you talk in a needlessly technical way that obfuscates what you're trying to say, increases likelihood of confusion, and makes conversations about even mundane topics needlessly cumbersome. Or to put it another way, "I'm disinclined to acquiesce to your request" sorts of language.

It can, in fact, mean both, and does to people. I know you don't particularly want to accept that, because it immediately defeats your argument.

Leading once again to:

Quote Originally Posted by Renathras View Post
Which is the entire reason I support the "4 Healers Model" in the first place.