Contrary to what you seem to believe, stating that your position is inflexible is not a personal attack. It was a statement of fact. "You smell" is a personal attack. "Your unwillingness to budge on your stance and find a compromise is inflexible" is not. You interpreted that as an attack and went on the offensive I defended my stance and tried to move the conversation forward. Five or six posts I tried to move the conversation forward and you refused because I gave back what you give me. You are always the one who starts swinging first, you just don't see it that way because you come from the perspective that you are inherently right and that's not up for debate, therefore when you swing, it's justified. When others swing, it's an attack on you. You don't seem to realize that.
When have you ever apologized to me? You don't think you need to, because you don't see being wrong as a possibility. That's why every other disagreement that occurs is cordial and respectful. I have no problem letting bygones be bygones, but I require the other person to have the same humility or there's no point. I have no problem apologizing if someone is offended regardless of whether or not I need to or whether or not I was wrong, but not if that person is going to treat that as an admission of guilt and publicly weaponize that in future discussion. Maybe you wouldn't do that, but I don't trust that you wouldn't, because I've never seen an example of humility from you.
You want things to be peaceful?
Stop accusing me of lying every 3 seconds. It pisses me off because I'm not lying. I'm telling you my perspective or what I know of yours from what you've said. If there are inconsistencies it's probably because it's impossible for any one person to keep track of everything you say when you write walls and walls of text constantly, shift ideas regularly, and abandon other ideas, like the two examples you gave before that have never been mentioned in the last four months.

Originally Posted by
Renathras
probably because you were still heated that I stopped responding to you in a separate thread, where you were being evasive and not answering directly a question asked, and then posted a condescending FLOW CHART after I cut off that line of communication and said I didn't care anymore because even _I_ could see it wasn't going to be a civil conversation
It wasn't evasive. You asked if I would play a support role, but you never gave any context as to what they would look like, how they would play, and how the other roles would function with the support role added. I have no idea if I would play them because I have no idea what they look like or what the game even looks like with them. You refused to read or acknowledge my answer over and over and wrote it off as some sort of "gotcha!" moment as if I was secretly afraid of saying "yes." But your conspiracy theory wouldn't have been needed if you just asked for clarification or expanded on the scenario instead of immediately writing me off as trying to subvert your question. Making a flow chart wasn't condescending; it was me trying to get you to understand what I was saying because simply describing it clearly wasn't working.